NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
Tim_J
Jun 15, 2016Aspirant
NIC Bonding on ReadyNAS
Hi, is it possible to span a bonded interface on a ReadyNAS across two managed switches that have a LAG link between them - something like below. The idea being that devices on the left will use l...
- Retired_MemberJun 15, 2016
Imho, this is is the easiest, cheapest, most efficient solution in your situation: https://i.imgur.com/BSD2u6r.png
No expensive hardware upgrade required, very easy to setup, and you won't get any significantly higher performance with a RN104 whatever other solution you use.
(Again, in my opinion)
StephenB
Jun 15, 2016Guru - Experienced User
jak0lantash wrote:
You have to think of ingress traffic as well as egress traffic.
Exactly. And for most NAS there is more egress (e.g. more downloading), and that is what you can't easily control. You can fiddle with iptables inside the NAS - some people have gone that route to separate isci/VM traffic from normal share access.
But getting a faster NAS, and (if physically practical) consolidating the two GS108T into a single larger switch are better approaches. Then use LACP with the NAS if there are enough simultaneous users.
Or get a second NAS, and put one on each switch.
Retired_Member
Jun 15, 2016Imho, this is is the easiest, cheapest, most efficient solution in your situation: https://i.imgur.com/BSD2u6r.png
No expensive hardware upgrade required, very easy to setup, and you won't get any significantly higher performance with a RN104 whatever other solution you use.
(Again, in my opinion)
- Tim_JJun 15, 2016Aspirant
Thanks to all for your thoughts and suggestions, much appreciated. TimJ.
- StephenBJun 15, 2016Guru - Experienced User
jak0lantash wrote:
Imho, this is is the easiest, cheapest, most efficient solution in your situation: https://i.imgur.com/BSD2u6r.png
That works and it is free. You're left with 3 spare ethernet ports on the left, you'd have 5 there if you didn't bother with the two bonds. Depending on the rest of the network, that might be a problem.
jak0lantash wrote:
you won't get any significantly higher performance with a RN104 whatever other solution you use.
I agree. The unit can't max out a single gigabit connection, so bonding isn't useful. LACP between the two switches might be, depending on the rest of the traffic load.
Related Content
NETGEAR Academy

Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!