ReadyNAS 102 - No alternative port on host field WTF Netgear Derps?

OK, so this is the EXACT mother f'ing problem. This guy says to keep it "listening" on port 22. Derp...can't you read my original post? It's not a LISTENING issue it's a destination problem. Stupid programmers seriously. In the filed you have a host (an IP or a hostname blahblahblah.com) then a port field...that's where it's going to. SSH by default as you clearly know listens on port 22 BUT you can change that and I do to fend off the hacker losers. Now...if you read my post you'd know that the problem with derpy Netgear programmers is they GIVE YOU THE OPTION TO TYPE INTO THE PORT FIELD BUT ONLY LET YOU USE PORT 22. That makes NO SENSE! Why can I overwrite the default value IF THEY DON'T LET YOU! Scenario: netgear crap box that's almost useless now >>>>> backup via ssh & rsync >>>>>> ALTERNATE PORT for SSH on the DESTINATION SIDE say 50000 (goes to the sshd on the destination server) >>>>>> done. So for every other customer I have I can use that alternate port 50000 except the one with the crap netgear box that although they let you overwrite the port field, they won't accept anything but 22 in the field. So mother f ing stupid. Allocating resources has nothing to do with it. It's clearly a VALID destination and host and all netgear needs to do is take out the piece of code that does the host name checking and blocks you from using port 22. How hard is that? It should have NEVER been put in! Who's the dev ops manager that thought that was a good idea? They should be strung up. To set the record straight I don't expect anything to come out of my comments other than making a point as to how stupid netgear is, these forums and how utterly pointless it is to make requests since they never get listened to. Sure, I can go in my destination firewall, allow port 22 from only the client site and port redirect it to port 50000 but WHY should I do that when the stupid STANDARD is allowing ANY port as the destination not just 22 and netgear dev had to go and F up a default that didn't need to be restricted. Can anyone see my point? Seriously! Yea...that other post was "moved" off the thread...again, proves my point. It's pointless to post crap like this. It just helps me to vent. MERICA! :P F U Netgear!