NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
Dewdman42
Sep 08, 2019Virtuoso
RN524X RAM upgrade
I am going to upgrade the RAM on my RN524X and just wanted to pass along information as I go for anyone in the future seeking the same help, since this procedure will VOID your warranty, Netgear will...
- Oct 20, 2019
Alright just wanted to report back again, the machine has been running great for a week with just the one good module installed, so all is good now, the memory was spec'd fine. The important point there was that one of the modules was/is faulty and the boot menu memory test did not spot that after running 25 hours with both modules installed. It did find come up more directly as a problem when running the boot menu memtest with just the one faulty module installed, the tester didn't spot it, but it crashed within 5 minutes after starting the test, two times in a row. And with that module installed (or both), the machine would boot up and run for a while, for hours..then spotaneously crash at some point, usually under some kind of CPU load...forcing a raid resync everytime, which was concerning to be honest, hopefully the data was not compromised, but anyway... seems to be sailing smooth now with just one 16gb module installed (see spec above). The faulty one has been sent back to HK for a refund. 16gb is more then enough anyway, I didn't really need 32gb.
So what performance differences do I notice after a week running smooth?
- a lot more caching memory is available and I notice that when I mount the raid from my mac over SMB, it is able to retrieve the folder contents list of certain folders with thousands of files, MUCH faster then before. This must be because that information is getting cached more now. However, i also notice that SMB process seems to run a little bit every once in a while to build that cache again when it needs to. But before I often had to wait minutes to open a folder and wait to see the conents (7000 files). Now it is often immediate.
- Before I had to setup a cron job to start crashplan and midnight and stop it in the morning because it was using nearly all of the factory 4gb memory. Now I can easily leave it running all day long and it barely causes the CPU to blink.
- Before gitlab was pretty much unusable with only 4gb of memory. Gitlab specs a need for 8gb+, and gitlab now runs perfectly fine and leaving it running all day, once it starts up, the CPU is having no problems.
- I am able to have up and running at all times gitlab+postgres, docker, portainer, crashplan, wordpress+MySQL, qdirStat, sabnzbd, sickchill and plex. No problems with memory, its using most of time only about 6gb of memory, and a nice large cache.
I do not think most people need to upgrade the memory on this box. I did so mainly to run gitlab, and also because crashplan was pushing it to the limit. What I can say is that if you have more advanced needs and are creatively using this box for stuff like I am, then its a pretty easy upgrade, once you locate the memory (not easy) and presuming the memory is not bad..which I might have just got unlucky that time.
Marking this thread as solved.
Dewdman42
Sep 08, 2019Virtuoso
See attached image for the backside of the ram stick.
Dewdman42
Sep 08, 2019Virtuoso
I'm thinking one or two of these might work: https://www.amazon.com/8GB-DDR4-2133-ECC-SO-DIMM-2RX8/dp/B00R29YQU2
- Dewdman42Sep 08, 2019Virtuoso
Or better yet, just one of these: https://www.newegg.com/p/0RM-0020-00165?item=9SIAKACA0X8350&source=region&nm_mc=knc-googlemkp-pc&cm_mmc=knc-googlemkp-pc-_-pla-aztek+computers-_-memory+%28notebook+memory%29-_-9SIAKACA0X8350&gclsrc=aw.ds&&gclid=CjwKCAjwzdLrBRBiEiwAEHrAYlhj6d8NyGMe5zi_mET01sI9HAs_Tw6dUR-_PmfTiZui-LNID-fH9BoCLRkQAvD_BwE
Then I'd have 16GB with an option to buy another one someday if that turned out to not be enough, which is unlikely.
Does anyone have any other feedback they'd like to make before I order something?
- SandsharkSep 09, 2019Sensei - Experienced User
The info on the Trancend page is inconsistent. It lists the 4GB device as having 512x8 chips, but then says the stick is 1RX4. That can't be. They don't show the back side, but I suspect it's really the 1RX8 your stick indicates.
The only potential problem with getting the larger sick is what is the max memory on that NAS. As you say, Netgear doesn't seem to want to share that information.
- Dewdman42Sep 09, 2019Virtuoso
My second post on this thread has a photo of the backside of the stick. There are 4 IC's on it. Maybe Transcend's sticker is wrong?
According to Netgear, they did already say on other threads that this box can support up to 32GB memory (16GBx2).
Related Content
NETGEAR Academy

Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!