NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
berillio
Jul 30, 2021Aspirant
RN424 , 4x 8TB WD Red Plus failing after 120 days?
This problem is with a RN424 with 4x 8TB WD80EFAX, all identical HDs purchased at the same time as the 424. The system has 6.10.4 Hotfix1 and has been up for 120 days, I had not even transferred all ...
berillio
Oct 05, 2021Aspirant
Just a quick update – I got in touch with the vendor (from where I bought the RN424 and the 4 HDs), they recommend doing the RMA directly with WD, which I did, got the reply with the RMA number and RMA Date: 08/11/2021 03:51 PM) and sent them my failed disk that afternoon, WD should have received next day.
Update #2 WD dispatched a replacement disk on 21 August (Saturday morning @5:02). unfortunately UPS failed to recognise the tracking number during the weekend, and also on Monday morning, but on Monday afternoon I received more mails following the despatching, with delivery expected by the end of 24 August.
Update #3 Received the replacement from WD on Wednesday 25 August 2021~9:00 am
I think I have read somewhere StephenB saying that he tests his replacement HDs, so I put on test using DLGDIAG – Estimated time required ~66h
Update #4 Friday 27 ~19:30. DLGDIAG fails the replacement HD “Too many bad sectors detected”. I immediately filed a “Question” on the WD Support (could not find any specific way of “connecting” to the RMA).
StephenB, Thank You !!!
Update #5 Wednesday 1 September ~19:05 “Incident Update” reply from WD
“……..I am sorry to hear that your replacement device was faulty well; relevant teams are informed about this issue and we will continue assisting you until we provide a solution.
It may take time to hear back from relevant teams about how to proceed but we will do our best to conclude this issue as fast as possible. ………”
Update #6 Thursday 2 September 18:05 (UK time)
On 30 July , when the incident occurred, the situation was:
RN424 has ~14.03TB used and 7.74TB free.
RN214a has ~7.71TB used and 3.19TB free
RN214b has ~4.22TB used, 4.97TB of snapshots and 1.77TB free
On 2 September, the situation is
RN424 – unprotected volume, NAS is offline. I did not copy/move any conspicuous amount of data, just the end of the folders in use, so the usage can be considered to be the same as above
RN214a – 8.35TB data, 138GB snapshots, 2.42 TB free of 10.90TB
RN214b – 5.73TB data, 955.54GB snapshots, 4.24 TB free of 10.90TB
Update #7 Monday 4 October (yes, it has been a month)
WD is still trying to sort out a replacement disk for me – there have been some wishful emails on their part expecially because my spare NAS has gone to 30% “space left”, then to 20% “space left”.
But I cannot wait any longer so I bought another 8TB WD Red Plus, CMR 7200rpm (as well as UPS, which was needed)
Update #8 Tuesday 5 October – Parcel delivered Hurray…..
Unfortunately I just checked and the WD80EFBX (supposedly the replacement for the WD80EFAX) is NOT in the compatibilty list…….
Sandshark
Oct 05, 2021Sensei
The compatibility list is a guide, and has not been updated in a while. The WD80EFBX is completel;y compatible -- one of my NAS has 4 of them.
- berillioOct 05, 2021Aspirant
Brilliant, thanks, pfeeww
I'll power the 424, which has been offline since the event, and "hot insert" the new disk.
Cheers !
- berillioOct 11, 2021Aspirant
Hi all, sorry for the delays
Tue 5 Oct at 21:55
Disk Model:WDC WD80EFBX-68AZZN0 Serial:VRGRW69K was added to Channel 2 of the head unit.
Tue 5 Oct at 21:55
Resyncing started for Volume data.
Wed 6 Oct at 15:30
Volume data is resynced.
Wed 6 Oct at 15:30
Volume data health changed from Degraded to Redundant.
Pfeww Hurray
Thank you to all for the support
Added note – WD has not replaced the failed disk yet.
When I will receive it (if I do), I could get another NAS, maybe a 2 bay one, and I could twin it with another 8TB on RAID 1, purely for backup duties.
Unfortunately NETGEAR seems to have disappared from the UK market, for reason I cannot really fathom.
One simple question – in the event of a NAS failure – can a RAID1 disk be read by any LINUX machine or would I need recovery software (which is kind of pricey)?
- StephenBOct 11, 2021Guru - Experienced User
berillio wrote:
in the event of a NAS failure – can a RAID1 disk be read by any LINUX machine or would I need recovery software (which is kind of pricey)?
Yes. You would need to install mdadm and btrfs on the linux system. But no paid software packges are needed.
- berillioOct 15, 2021Aspirant
@@Stephen B wrote:
Yes. You would need to install mdadm and btrfs……….
Thank you :-)
Updates
Wednesday 13 October 2021 ~ 15:30
UPS parcel, WD80EFAX S.N. VGGW8JKK ; 256 MB cache 5400 rpm (? I thought it was 7200rpm..?)
Disk goes on test with DLGDIAG, Quick test Passed, starting Extended test (on my USB system ~60-70 h)
Thursday 14 October 2021 14:02 – Too Many Bad Sectors (after 22h10m, 44h49m remaining)
Mailed WD with the screencap of DLGDIAG
Did somebody put a Jinx on me ???
:-( :-( :-(
- StephenBOct 15, 2021Guru - Experienced User
berillio wrote:
WD80EFAX S.N. VGGW8JKK ; 256 MB cache 5400 rpm (? I thought it was 7200rpm..?)
It is 7200 rpm. https://www.pcmag.com/news/western-digital-confuses-everyone-with-5400-rpm-class-hard-drives
Note after this came out, WD put 7200 rpm on their datasheet (with a footnote talking about the performance class). Not sure if they updated the firmware to report the actual speed.
berillio wrote:
Mailed WD with the screencap of DLGDIAG
Did somebody put a Jinx on me ???
Ouch. That possibility is why I also test mine before putting them in my NAS.
Related Content
NETGEAR Academy
Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!