NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
Debashish
Aug 15, 2019Aspirant
Are these ping respone results is ideal for every one??
I have purchased Netgear R6700v3 recently. After installing the router I have found some issues. I pinged my wifi device IP from my host machine which is connected with wire from the router, found huge delay response. Response time showing 300ms which is worst. I have connected several devices with wifi and found the same result. Below is the details:
Host Machine IP: 192.168.1.11 (connected through wire from wifi device)
wifi device IP: 192.168.1.12 (connected through 5G wifi)
wifi device IP: 192.168.1.3 (connected through 2G wifi)
First Ping from Host Machine to 5G wifi Device:
Pinging 192.168.1.12 with 32 bytes of data
Reply from 192.168.1.12: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.12: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.12: bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.12: bytes=32 time=101ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.12: bytes=32 time=122ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.12: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.12: bytes=32 time=164ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.12: bytes=32 time=185ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.12: bytes=32 time=201ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.12: bytes=32 time=224ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.12: bytes=32 time=244ms TTL=64
Ping statistics for 192.168.1.12:
Packets: Sent = 11, Received = 11, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 60ms, Maximum = 250ms, Average = 161ms
******Average is showing 161ms. Is this Normal ??? Is this should be less than 10ms???
Second Ping from Host Machine to 2G wifi Device:
Pinging 192.168.1.3 with 32 bytes of data
Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time=453ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time=237ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time=425ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time=340ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time=222ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time=458ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time=170ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time=420ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time=258ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time=123ms TTL=64
Ping statistics for 192.168.1.3:
Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 50ms, Maximum = 458ms, Average = 270ms
******Average is showing 270ms. Is this Normal ??? Is this should be less than 10ms???
Please Help us to ensure is this ok or not???
16 Replies
- myerswMaster
No this would not be ok. I assume you also tried pinging the router at 192.168.1.1 and got similar results. Even my Internet ping times using my iPhone to ping 8.8.8.8 is less then 30ms. On network more like 1 to 2. Definitely something wrong. Please detail all that you have done to try to fix this. Include firmware version number, not something like latest.
- DebashishAspirant
Dear myersw, Many thanks for your reply.
****Here is my Device Details:
Hardware Version R6700v3
Firmware Version V1.0.4.78_10.0.55Wireless Settings (2.4GHz):
Channel: 11
Mode Up to 450 MbpsWireless Settings (5GHz):
Channel: 161
Mode Up to 1300 MbpsHere is my ping result of 192.168.1.1 IP:
Pinging 192.168.1.1 with 32 bytes of data
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64Ping statistics for 192.168.1.1:
Packets: Sent = 8, Received = 8, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0msLooks like it is good.
Please note, after install i have updated the device with new Firmware which is currently have.
Please suggest how can i resolve this issue.
- DebashishAspirant
I am seeking for solution. Can any one please help me on this??
If any other info require please let me know.