NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
Kev_Kostner
May 02, 2014Aspirant
BtrFS version and reliability of RN 102
I have suffered some very bad experiences with scrubbing of BtrFS on kernel version 3.2.26. From studying the docu I got the impression that ReadyNAS 102 uses an older version with most probably ev...
Kev_Kostner
May 03, 2014Aspirant
mdgm wrote: c) There is backported newer code.
I would recommend you consider the 312 which has an Intel CPU and 2GB RAM as opposed to the ARM CPU and 512 MB RAM in the 102.
Thank you for your suggestion.
I saw from the posting of ljung that the BtrFS code must be back ported.
Can anybody confirm that in ReadyNAS it is exactly v0.20-rc1?
Where in the www is that backported source coude available?
I am aware of the limited resources of a RN 102, but since it is intended only as a remote backup from the production server using ZFS and powerful hardware, do you see any points why RN 102 should not be used for that purpose?
Thank you!
Related Content
NETGEAR Academy
Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!