NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
Sailphoto
Nov 15, 2011Aspirant
Disk size and hotswap backup
Hi,
New here.
I have a couple of PCs on a home LAN and want something better for backup/reliability. I think the answer is an NAS with RAID1.
I haven't managed to find anyone doing it, but my thought was to get 3 hard drives and use 2 in raid 1 and the other held off-site as backup. At regular intervals the drives would be rotated (hot swapped?). Is that a good strategy? Would that be straight forward to do or is there a trick to it?
Can you tell when the disk is fully mirrored and so I can swap out?
Generally NAS literature seems a bit light on what disks you can use - is it any 3.5" SATA disk? I have read some have a limit of 2TB others 3TB - which models support 2TB or 3TB (or more?).
Thanks!!
New here.
I have a couple of PCs on a home LAN and want something better for backup/reliability. I think the answer is an NAS with RAID1.
I haven't managed to find anyone doing it, but my thought was to get 3 hard drives and use 2 in raid 1 and the other held off-site as backup. At regular intervals the drives would be rotated (hot swapped?). Is that a good strategy? Would that be straight forward to do or is there a trick to it?
Can you tell when the disk is fully mirrored and so I can swap out?
Generally NAS literature seems a bit light on what disks you can use - is it any 3.5" SATA disk? I have read some have a limit of 2TB others 3TB - which models support 2TB or 3TB (or more?).
Thanks!!
13 Replies
Replies have been turned off for this discussion
- PapaBear1ApprenticeSeems that there is a list of features not supported in 5.3.x so the UI is simplified. It may be a while before they port it over.
- Roland_LAspirantPorting the new UI to the x86 platform shouldn't be that complicated, if the backend doesn't change. Also, adding missing options in the user interface should be rather easy, if the backend already provides the necessary functions.
Leaving the old Sparc-based products behind after a long period of support is ok in my book. The old CPU's will not be able to run the new user interface anyway.
I really hope the new UI will be available on the x86 products very soon! - mdgm-ntgrNETGEAR Employee Retired
Roland L wrote: Porting the new UI to the x86 platform shouldn't be that complicated, if the backend doesn't change. Also, adding missing options in the user interface should be rather easy, if the backend already provides the necessary functions.
It's more difficult than you might think. These things take time. The options in the UI and the web code for them would likely have to be written from scratch. There's also decision making needed on how to show the additional options of the x86 units in the UI in a logical way, but a way that keeps it fairly consistent with the ARM devices.
Also the ARM units use Debian Squeeze whereas the x86 units use Debian Etch. If porting to squeeze is needed the backend work could take quite some time to sort out (chirpa has said they've looked into using Squeeze: http://www.readynas.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=51&t=58629&p=332047). Not to mention if they provide the UI to existing units, getting the update to work smoothly will take some work.
With the ARM units there was the advantage that on the very first firmware users would be using the new UI, so no update of users from an old UI and not as many features needed in a first release with the new UI.Roland L wrote:
I really hope the new UI will be available on the x86 products very soon!
I doubt it. Maybe sometime next year, but we'll have to wait and see.
Related Content
NETGEAR Academy
Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!