NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
mdgm-ntgr
Apr 29, 2015NETGEAR Employee Retired
General Feedback on 6.2.3/6.2.4
This thread is a place to leave general feedback on 6.2.3/6.2.4
82 Replies
Replies have been turned off for this discussion
- StephenBGuru - Experienced UserI've had no issues with it on my RN102. (I'd been running the 6.2.3 betas, the upgrade to 6.2.3 was painless).
- I have noticed the following:
PC Desktop with a Core i7 Extreme 980x/256 SSD OCZ-AGILITY
Upload and download speeds (using a 1 gb avi file are at 118mbps using SMB and FTP protocols)
Macbook Pro Retina 15" Core i7 2.3 Ghz / 512 SSD
Upload and download speeds (using a 1 gb avi file are at 94 mbps using SMB and 117 mbps using FTP protocols)
SSH Testingroot@READYNASPRO:/dev# hdparm -t -T /dev/sda, etc. output:
/dev/sda:
Timing cached reads: 7250 MB in 2.00 seconds = 3626.99 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 322 MB in 3.02 seconds = 106.77 MB/sec
/dev/sdb:
Timing cached reads: 7156 MB in 2.00 seconds = 3580.41 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 494 MB in 3.00 seconds = 164.57 MB/sec
/dev/sdc:
Timing cached reads: 7486 MB in 2.00 seconds = 3745.58 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 370 MB in 3.01 seconds = 122.79 MB/sec
/dev/sdd:
Timing cached reads: 7134 MB in 2.00 seconds = 3569.09 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 356 MB in 3.01 seconds = 118.26 MB/sec
/dev/sde:
Timing cached reads: 7592 MB in 2.00 seconds = 3798.64 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 354 MB in 3.00 seconds = 117.95 MB/sec
/dev/sdf:
Timing cached reads: 7274 MB in 2.00 seconds = 3639.48 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 342 MB in 3.01 seconds = 113.51 MB/sec
I have noticed that the web interface seems to load faster in addition to certain functions (i.e. share listing).
Raidar 6.0 is lovely!!
My hats go off to the developers for (I imagine) keeping us OS legacy hardware guys in the arena!!! - OvrQualifiedAspirantNo problems at all on my personal 516, as well as several 3220s and a 3130 (thanks for fixing that annoying Vcore message, it was driving me mad!) that I feed and care for. None of those units use AD integration, so I'm not affected by that bug. By pure luck, one 3220 that is AD joined I didn't have a chance to update because I didn't have a maintenance window...will be holding on upgrading until that one's fixed.
Overall, good release for us! - anna_arunNETGEAR ExpertVery Good Release !!! Also the Raidar 6 is excellent update .
- vandermerweMasterI've used all the 6.2.3 beta releases and now the final 6.2.3 on my 316 with no issues whatsoever.
- peterkinGuide6.2.3 is running fine on my RN102, but I've got a couple of gripes about the new Raidar 6 as compared with the old 4.3.8:
- Uses far more screen real estate.I only have two NAS, but I still have to scroll between them. What if I had 10 NAS boxen?
- Doesn't show my UPS status
- Doesn't show volume status
- Doesn't show fan speed
Mostly it's the real estate that's the problem. Can we have a version with a compact view and more info? For now I'm sticking with the old version. - 6.2.3 installed fine on my RN314 when t was officially released, and I have since added another disk to the array to fully populate it.
However, checking the log this morning I note a message ''System: UPS on Port:USB removed. Manufacturer: CPS, Model: BR850ELCD, Serial: ." and sure enought the NAS has lost sight of my UPS. Any ideas team? - rikstigter1Aspirant6.2.4. Installed fine on my RN104. No issues whatsoever, but then the same was true for 6.2.3. :D
- BaJohnVirtuoso
There is another post which specifically includes this http://www.readynas.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=87&t=80273. (It was happening on the previous OS).Punchbuggy wrote: However, checking the log this morning I note a message ''System: UPS on Port:USB removed. Manufacturer: CPS, Model: BR850ELCD, Serial: ." and sure enought the NAS has lost sight of my UPS. Any ideas team? - BaJohnVirtuosoBoth updates to 6.2.3 and then 6.2.4 went smoothly. Not certain why they had to be within a few days of each other though.
However, during the few days of 6.2.3 a 'data scrub' was carried out and took slightly longer (1.6%) than that for 6.2.2.
See post http://www.readynas.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=79865 for further details.
I suspect that this is not that significant. Next time a 'scrub' is carried out it will be on 6.2.4 or higher.
Related Content
NETGEAR Academy

Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!