NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
Leroy1
Apr 10, 2014Aspirant
My idea's for Readynas OS 6.2
Hello,
I don't know if I can post my ideas here but here is a list of ideas for the upcoming OS
I don't use the SSH feauture to lose my warranty
- Disk spin-down (already featured)
- Firewall settings
- Build-in torrent application (if possible)
- More SMB settings
- More security settings for users
- The option to enable htaccess (Really missing it now)
- Maybe MySQL, PHP built-in with a control panel to change settings etc.
- Hibernate mode (if possible)
- S.M.A.R.T status
- HDD health status
I hope you guys can do something with the list. I respect your choices Netgear if you won't change anything what is listed above, but I hope you guys will implent it ;)
I don't know if I can post my ideas here but here is a list of ideas for the upcoming OS
I don't use the SSH feauture to lose my warranty
- Disk spin-down (already featured)
- Firewall settings
- Build-in torrent application (if possible)
- More SMB settings
- More security settings for users
- The option to enable htaccess (Really missing it now)
- Maybe MySQL, PHP built-in with a control panel to change settings etc.
- Hibernate mode (if possible)
- S.M.A.R.T status
- HDD health status
I hope you guys can do something with the list. I respect your choices Netgear if you won't change anything what is listed above, but I hope you guys will implent it ;)
3 Replies
Replies have been turned off for this discussion
- StephenBGuru - Experienced UserSome of these things are already in OS6.
- xeltrosApprentice=> Folder management for backups and sharing is the most critical thing missing right now. I really hate to duplicate my data because I want to share a specific folder with someone. I also want backups to exclude some files/folders.
=> For firewall, a fully fledged firewall with an interface would be nice, but you can use iptables for basic needs though I couldn't configure fail2ban (you miss the log, you need rsyslog, and then you get startup errors that you solve by adding a sleep timer in a script, and then you have an iptables problem that I haven't solved yet).
=> task automation (scrub, defrag, ability to do partial scans with the anti virus (on a scheduled time with an exclude time range in case scan is not finish when you start to work)
=> advanced monitoring (Cacti isn't quite that, I would have shinken instead and more options in the interface to show graphs).
=> progress bar for backups, virus scan and defrag
=> disk spin down
I don't agree with you for built in things, it will add weight to the OS and since RN102/104 is not powerful it's not advisable for those models, I prefer to have reliable packets aside that you can choose to install or not (and that may integrate on the interface once installed). You already have PHP/Mysql/PHPMyAdmin, Qtorrent and Transmission.
SMART, HDD health are already integrated. For hibernate you have a scheduled shutdown/boot functionality.
If you want HTAccess for password only, you already have it too.
I don't see what you mean by "more security settings for users", I'd just like to be able to set ready cloud rights within the local interface but apart from that I don't see what you can add.
SMB settings are already good, you have an add-on to switch the version for compatibility. What settings do you need ? - jhaye1AspirantFail2ban would definitely be an eagerly desirable feature. For the moment I have a RN104 running as an RSYNC-over-SSH backup server, for a few RN102 clients. Problem is that you can't explicitly tell which SSH port you want to leverage when configuring an RSYNC-over-SSH backup job on the RN clients. Thus I'm forced to expose my backup server's port 22 (i.e. SSH). And guess what ? I have numerous daily SSH intrusion tentatives on my RN104 (as much as 5000 a day, sometimes). Fortunately I'm using 20 characters long password (generated with Keepass), making a brute force attack rather difficult. But still, I don't quite understand why there is no built-in defense mechanism (Fail2ban or alike) in ReadyNAS. This takes me to consider ReadyNAS as a great product, but not a professional one.
And at the first place, I don't get why we still can't specify a port when defining an RSYNC-over-SSH backup job, which sounds like a very trivial features in Linux world, to me. But this is another topic (see http://www.readynas.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=73441)
Cheers
Jean-Marc
Related Content
NETGEAR Academy
Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!