NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
chopin70
Jan 05, 2016Virtuoso
Scrub/Defrag/Snapshots with Seagate Archive 8TB - ST8000AS0002
Hi, I am thinking at putting a pare of these disks as XRAID (data redundancy) in my legacy Ultra 2 unit with latest 6.4.1 firmware. I understand the limitations. However, I does own one in my de...
chopin70
Jan 06, 2016Virtuoso
Desktop is an i5 clocked at 3.4 GHz with 32 Gb of RAM, so yes, it is faster than my Ultra 2 NAS.
The disks in the NAS are Seagate NAS HDD 4TB - ST4000VN000 (2x): 64Mb cache and 5900 rpm
The write speed of 2 to 16Gb files is very poor from desktop to the NAS (75 MB /sec), compared from desktop disk 1 to desktop Archive HDD (150 MB /s). NAS is using a full 1Gb LAN connection
Scrubs are scheduled every 3 months
StephenB
Jan 06, 2016Guru - Experienced User
Not sure if this is useful to you: http://www.storagereview.com/seagate_archive_hdd_review_8tb
They put two drives in a synology DS1815+ and measured read/write and rebuild times for a RAID-1 array.
Building the array took ~57 hours (~3x longer than a PMR drive). Large backups averaged about 30 MB/s. Small incremental backups ran about the same speed as a PMR disk.
I think if I were doing this I'd use jbod, and set up incremental backup jobs to update the second volume from the first. That reduces the stress of the long resync times, and gives you the option of switching to the second volume when the first had poor performance. If you go that route, stagger the maintenance schedules.
- chopin70Jan 06, 2016Virtuoso
I was aware of that review before buying my first unit of these disks, 6 months ago.
JBOD is certainly an alternative, but read speeds could suffer compared to a RAID 1 right?
Also, I am more concerned by this, from Netgear kb:
[Quote]
Scrubbing checks all stored data for consistency, and therefore will also discover potential errors in files that have not been accessed in a long time. If multiple hard discs are used in a RAID Array Level 1 or greater then scrubbing will also correct any errors found automatically. Scrubbing does not delete any data on the device.
[/Quote]
With jbod, there is no real need to run a scrub. Better run an md5 sum check on a regular base.
I fully understand the limitations + the risk of a failure when rebuilding the array with too large disks
Currently I run in a 4 disks mirrored backup scheme: NAS RAID 1 mirroring 1 Archive 8TB HDD on the PC via wired LAN. The 4th disk is an offsite backup done every week. All data has md5 sum checks that can be verified in the worst case to chose the right file to preserve in case of a failure or mismatch.
I'd prefer a regular disk, however, at 8TB, these are out of price
In reality, I am even waiting for the upcoming 10Tb disks Seagate promised
- powellandy1Jan 06, 2016Virtuoso
Hi
I have 3 of these Seagate 8TB drives in an Ultra 6 on 6.4.2b1. I haven't had any problems with this firmware, and I think the fix was applied in 6.4.1.
As long as you don't have them in a RAID array that requires extensive building (I have them set up as JBOD - which I think as StephenB says is a RAID0 volume accross all the drives) the performance is fine and the wear on the disk minimal. Similarly, provided data is not deleted and re-written the performance and wear is good. Similarly when used in this way you don't need to defrag/scrub etc.. which will cause wear.
A
- chopin70Jan 06, 2016Virtuoso
thanks for the feedback
Since I own the NAS, I rebuilt 3 times: once when upgrading from 4.x to 6.x, once because of a corruption caused by manually messing folders and permissions via SSH during 6.x test phase and once because one of my children did a forced unexpected shutdown
I quiet never rebuild in a RAID1, data stored is mainly video and photos that stay "for ever". There is a few gigs of data that are updated in small parts (app updates, sync mobile devices contents...)
Read operations are mainly handled from the PC mirror.
So, my pure use is cold backup in RAID 1 (updated as I mentioned above) and as a DLNA server
Seems it shouldn't deceive me in the NAS more than in my actual desktop...
Related Content
NETGEAR Academy

Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!