NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
TeknoJnky
Oct 31, 2011Hero
Seagate ST4000DX000-1C5160 [3726 GB] 4TB
firmware cc42 date 12047 dom 7/2011
bare drive pulled from usb3 external @ http://www.amazon.com/Seagate-FreeAgent ... 914&sr=8-1
single drive, boot menu factory defaulted, all frontview defaults.
ultra 4: 4.2.20-t4, no JF, single nic
217 MB (0%) of 3696 GB used
Ch 1 : Seagate ST4000DX000-1C5160 [3726 GB]
3721 GB allocated
drag/drop 15g from ssd via cifs gbit to default backup share
peaks of ~80-85 mibs
windows dialog reported speed ~45 mibs
pro business (v1): 4.2.17, no JF, single nic
217 MB (0%) of 3696 GB used
Ch 1 : Seagate ST4000DX000-1C5160 [3726 GB]
3721 GB allocated
drag/drop 15g from ssd via cifs gbit to default backup share
peaks of ~115mibs
windows dialog reported speed ~79 mibs
reading same 15g file back to ssd showed 110 on windows copy dialog, constant 115-118 on netmeter
other notes;
only 1 drive at this time, so unable to test raid/expansion
drive seems to be pretty quiet, can't really hear it over the device fans
spent about 30 minutes on each device, so no extended testing, just setup and a few drag/drop transfers
Can't wait for tax return time or saving up for 5 more drives, I'm looking forward to 6x 4tb in dual redundancy.
bare drive pulled from usb3 external @ http://www.amazon.com/Seagate-FreeAgent ... 914&sr=8-1
single drive, boot menu factory defaulted, all frontview defaults.
ultra 4: 4.2.20-t4, no JF, single nic
217 MB (0%) of 3696 GB used
Ch 1 : Seagate ST4000DX000-1C5160 [3726 GB]
3721 GB allocated
drag/drop 15g from ssd via cifs gbit to default backup share
peaks of ~80-85 mibs
windows dialog reported speed ~45 mibs
pro business (v1): 4.2.17, no JF, single nic
217 MB (0%) of 3696 GB used
Ch 1 : Seagate ST4000DX000-1C5160 [3726 GB]
3721 GB allocated
drag/drop 15g from ssd via cifs gbit to default backup share
peaks of ~115mibs
windows dialog reported speed ~79 mibs
reading same 15g file back to ssd showed 110 on windows copy dialog, constant 115-118 on netmeter
other notes;
only 1 drive at this time, so unable to test raid/expansion
drive seems to be pretty quiet, can't really hear it over the device fans
spent about 30 minutes on each device, so no extended testing, just setup and a few drag/drop transfers
Can't wait for tax return time or saving up for 5 more drives, I'm looking forward to 6x 4tb in dual redundancy.
Model: ST4000DX000-1C5160
Serial: Z1[removed]
Firmware: CC42
SMART Attribute
Spin Up Time 0
Start Stop Count 10
Reallocated Sector Count 0
Power On Hours 1
Spin Retry Count 0
Power Cycle Count 10
Reported Uncorrect 0
High Fly Writes 0
Airflow Temperature Cel 31
G-Sense Error Rate 0
Power-Off Retract Count 8
Load Cycle Count 16
Temperature Celsius 31
Current Pending Sector 0
Offline Uncorrectable 0
UDMA CRC Error Count 0
Head Flying Hours 187685775867905
ATA Error Count 0
50 Replies
Replies have been turned off for this discussion
- bbaraniecLuminaryI hope I'm gonna have $$$ to find out how long it takes ;) Thanks for answers.
- I think anyone who uses 2+tb drives in a six bay device and does not use dual redundancy is crazy, but that is just me.
as already previously mentioned, with single redundancy and very large arrays;
1) that is a crap ton of data
2) whenever a disk is swapped and/or a resync is going on, your data is vulnerable.
3) if you have 8tb+ and its not backed up, and a 2nd disk fails during a resync/rebuild/expansion, you are F'd with a capital F.
dual redundancy is the only way to go, even with 6x 2tb drives.
Anyone who uses single redundancy, *and* has no backup, gets no sympathy from me when all their stuff disappears. - mdgm-ntgrNETGEAR Employee RetiredYes 6x3TB is possible. Though with that I'd be wanting to use dual-redundancy. With 3TB drives resync times when replacing disks would be starting to get very long.
6x4TB in dual-redundancy would be below the 16TB limit as well. Though if all drive bays are full a factory default would be needed to switch to dual-redundancy. - bbaraniecLuminaryFirst of all is the money issue ;) I don't want to spent 2000$ for drives. Second you can't go beyond 16TB without factory default, that's why 6x3TB is still possible. 6x4TB should give you:
5x3726GB in single redundancy should give you almost 18TB. Man that's a lot of space, but I will be happy with 14 ;)
@TeknoJnky correct me if I'm wrong but in this case 6x3TB is still possible with single redundancy since it's only 14TB, "6th" drive is not counted. - cubewebsolutionAspirantWhy wouldn't you just go 6 x 4TB drives... ?
I'm also curious, 6x4TB drives is 24GB, how much of that would be usable space in the ReadyNAS? - I believe the jedi's have mentioned the expansion and 16tb limit are due to a combination of ext4 and the expansion utilities.
With 3 & 4 tb drives being readily available, I would hope that work is actively being done to resolve issues, but I am sure its no simple fix or it would have been done already. - bbaraniecLuminaryYup, you are right here. I'm backing up the important data to external drives. Once the hard drive prices goes back to normal I'm gonna try upgrading to 6x3TB. Still I would love to know, why there is a limitation right now.
- mdgm-ntgrNETGEAR Employee RetiredIf using single-redundancy and you remove a disk you array will be degraded. Adding a new disk puts heavy stress on all disks, so if you do this process repeatedly and one of the disks you happen to not replace or get to replacing last is failing you can have a disk failure at a bad moment (e.g. during a resync). Backups are very important. As is testing the existing disks (e.g. using "Disk Test"' boot option)
- bbaraniecLuminaryI would still prefer 2 weeks approach then starting from scratch. I think everyone has put more or less time into "tuning" ReadyNas.
You are replacing only 1 drive at the time, so in worse case scenario you will be left with degraded array but still access to data.
But anyway, where is limitation right now? - sphardy1Apprentice
bbaraniec wrote:
No everyone can afford another equal ReadyNas just to have it as a backup.
It's that or 2 weeks to expand. And if there happens to be a fault with a disk mid-expansion? Makes dual redundancy a must
IMO the expansion times required with 3TB+ drives now makes the whole idea of online expansion completely irrelevant
Related Content
NETGEAR Academy

Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!