NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
mps
Apr 16, 2014Aspirant
SSD on Pro
I am thinking of putting Samsung 840Pro SSDs in my ReadyNas Pro. Yes, I know it's not on the HCL but would like opinion. I currently have 2 512GB hard drives and 2 2TB hard drives. Could I migrate the...
mps
Apr 20, 2014Aspirant
Very interesting post, StephenB. Thinking out loud below.
I think there would be a big performance gain since LMS is running directly on the ReadyNAS and often does disk-intensive operations like scanning my music collection or Sqlite queries.
That approach is appealing, but I think it comes back to the question of how I'd provide redundancy in case of a disk failure. While I make occasional backups, RAID has proven invaluable to me for seamless real-time protection when a disk failed.
I didn't realize this. Looks like I'd have to replace them all at once. Not a dealbreaker, but definitely more painful.
StephenB wrote: Assuming I am correct in thinking that your hard drive is 500 GB and your SSD is 512 GB, then you will probably have trouble simply inserting the SSD into the RAID array. With XRAID2, a new drive is either (a) >= the largest drive in the array or (b) exactly the same size as the drive it is replacing.
Also, I said I didn't see much value in SSD in RAID. A single SSD is faster than gigabit ethernet, so there is no performance gain in a RAID array of SSDs over jbod.
I think there would be a big performance gain since LMS is running directly on the ReadyNAS and often does disk-intensive operations like scanning my music collection or Sqlite queries.
That is an interesting observation. How would you provide redundancy then?
With RAID-1 or RAID-5 you double the disk writes over jbod, with RAID-6 you triple the disk writes. And the writes to a consumer grade SSD are what limit its life. If all the SSDs are identical, and in the same array, then the writes should also nearly identical. So my guess is that they are even more likely to fail together than traditional drives, overwhelming RAID protection.
IIUC, the garbage collection on newer SSDs is good enough that TRIM is more of a "nice to have" than "have to have"
And with jbod, you can get trim to work more easily.
No. I am proposing a "pure SSD" solution.
In your case, you are proposing a mix of SSD and hard drives. Your music files and directories will be partly on SSD and partly not. It won't be slower than your current setup, but it seems unlikely to be a giant step up either.
So if it were me, I'd back up the music, etc. and remove all the drives. Then install the two SSDs as jbod, load up some music, and see how it performs. If it works, then solve the trim problem, perhaps add in some the hard drives as a second RAID-1 volume and go from there. If it doesn't help, then power down, install all your old drives and you are back to where you are now.
That approach is appealing, but I think it comes back to the question of how I'd provide redundancy in case of a disk failure. While I make occasional backups, RAID has proven invaluable to me for seamless real-time protection when a disk failed.
Related Content
NETGEAR Academy

Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!