NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
Babbage
Dec 13, 2014Aspirant
6.2.0 upgrade problems on RN104
Since upgrading my RN104 to 6.2.0 I've had similar problems to those listed by other users: - Unable to shutdown or reboot. Display shows appropriate message and power button LED flashes, but noth...
Babbage
Dec 29, 2014Aspirant
Still no joy so I decided I might as well do a factory reset as everything's double backed up. I've now got drive 4 set up as a single volume and am filling it up just to make sure it's OK, which will take 22 hours with no verification enabled. If I don't hit an invisible wall at 2.12TB again I should be good to go for combining all 4 drives into a single volume tomorrow evening.
I've been reading the manual again and giving some thought to which RAID mode to use, and it occurs to me that X-RAID2 might be a better choice as it would allow me to gradually upgrade to 6TB drives over the next 4 months rather than buying 4 all at once and having to restore all the data yet again. However, with the existing 4 x 3TB drives it will mean 3TB of disk space will be reserved for data protection, which I would have to cope with by temporarily keeping the double backup, and I would only end up increasing my total storage space by 4TB (EDIT: 6TB!), so I'm not sure if this is going to be worth it.
By the way, despite reading the Netgear description of X-RAID2 and the Wikipedia entry on RAID-5, I found myself baffled by how, when a drive is replaced, the lost data can be rebuilt from the parity spread across the other three drives. I wondered if I could find an easily understandable explanation of how it actually works in practice or if should I just accept it as magic and get on with life. Well I found an explanation, and it turns out it is magic! http://riceball.com/d/content/raid-5-parity-what-it-and-how-does-it-work
I've been reading the manual again and giving some thought to which RAID mode to use, and it occurs to me that X-RAID2 might be a better choice as it would allow me to gradually upgrade to 6TB drives over the next 4 months rather than buying 4 all at once and having to restore all the data yet again. However, with the existing 4 x 3TB drives it will mean 3TB of disk space will be reserved for data protection, which I would have to cope with by temporarily keeping the double backup, and I would only end up increasing my total storage space by 4TB (EDIT: 6TB!), so I'm not sure if this is going to be worth it.
By the way, despite reading the Netgear description of X-RAID2 and the Wikipedia entry on RAID-5, I found myself baffled by how, when a drive is replaced, the lost data can be rebuilt from the parity spread across the other three drives. I wondered if I could find an easily understandable explanation of how it actually works in practice or if should I just accept it as magic and get on with life. Well I found an explanation, and it turns out it is magic! http://riceball.com/d/content/raid-5-parity-what-it-and-how-does-it-work
Related Content
NETGEAR Academy
Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!