NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
YorkBoy
Dec 05, 2015Luminary
6.4.1 and the problems from 6.4.0 are still there. #26140511
I have a 102 and all was fine on 6.2.5
Then I updated to 6.4.0. and all USB backups failed as it seems as has happened with others.
Now updated to 6.4.1 and on attempting a USB backup the...
YorkBoy
Dec 06, 2015Luminary
Further update.
It seems that for some reason my front socket on my 102 if used causes the unit to freeze even though I have always used this socket and the backup button in the past.
I have just altered my settings to enable this backup to be performed from the back upper socket.
All went well except it was very slow.
But even though the NAS 'ejected' the stick it still continues to appear on my shares. This is the very same problem I had when I first bought the unit which was given the title 'ghost shares'. It took ages to sort.
However on then plugging in a WD hard drive to perform a complete backup even though this was successful it took three times as long as it used to and strangely the 'ghost share' now shows excatly the same storage capacity as this WD drive as if its a mirror of it.
Have sent the information to Netgear but hold out little hope that this will be delat with quickly.
I have also asked if, now that I have an up to date back up, if I can factory reset my NAS and force it to reinstall 6.2.5 which worked a treat. No response from Netgear.
You really have to ask yourself how such a thing can be allowed to happen? I run no apps, just a standard 102 with a very basic setup.
If I ever get this going again I will never update my firmware, leave well alone.
In sheer frustration I went to order a WD NAS but stopped the order. I'm now thinking that was a big mistake.
StephenB
Dec 06, 2015Guru - Experienced User
YorkBoy wrote:
I have also asked if, now that I have an up to date back up, if I can factory reset my NAS and force it to reinstall 6.2.5 which worked a treat. No response from Netgear.
See ifixidevices post on this thread: https://community.netgear.com/t5/ReadyNAS-Beta-Release/Downgrading-from-6-4-0-to-6-2-4-with-a-Pro-Pioneer/td-p/1006544
Netgear doesn't recommend that method, but it seems to have worked for the people who tried it.
- YorkBoyDec 06, 2015Luminary
Interesting.
Certainly having a good backup (two actually) of the complete data from the NAS this doesn't appear to be too much of a risk. Its worth a punt and then Netgear can go and hang.
Thank you.
Quite honestly I wonder what the legal side of all this is? There are people in business who have been told that theres an update to be installed and they in good faith follow Netgears instructions and ruin their systems. Isn't there any liability here?
My unit, a 102, still in warranty and I would gladly hand it back for a refund. I'll neve rbuy or recommend their equipment ever again.
- StephenBDec 06, 2015Guru - Experienced User
Discussion of legal topics in the past hasn't gone anywhere useful (and answers would depend on the jurisdiction anyway).
It'd be best to keep off that topic here.
- mdgm-ntgrDec 07, 2015NETGEAR Employee Retired
Ronbo02467, I have moved your post into a new thread. Your post is for a business product and would be best discussed in a separate thread.
Related Content
NETGEAR Academy

Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!