NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.

Forum Discussion

new11's avatar
new11
Tutor
Sep 03, 2020
Solved

Incorrect Consumed Storage

Hey guys, I hope everyone is keeping well!

For some odd reason, there’s a share that is reporting an incorrect “consumed” amount in the local GUI of the NAS. The value returned is: “16777216TB” of consumed space!?... (There is only 304MB of files.) The PC is simply connected to the share via drive mapping.

I’ve destroyed the snapshots for that share, defragged, scrubbed and balanced the system. (RAID 1) at this point not too sure what to do. 

Has anyone ever come across this before, have any suggestions or should I just leave it be? 

I’ve attached a highlighted screenshot.  

Cheers

  • Try creating a temporary share, and use a backup job to copy the contents.  If that shows the correct size, you can delete the original share, and rename the temporary one to match the original's name.

3 Replies

Replies have been turned off for this discussion
  • StephenB's avatar
    StephenB
    Guru - Experienced User

    Try creating a temporary share, and use a backup job to copy the contents.  If that shows the correct size, you can delete the original share, and rename the temporary one to match the original's name.

    • new11's avatar
      new11
      Tutor

      Hi StephenB, 
      Thanks for the suggestion, I suppose I should have said in my OP that I'm a little more curious as to why the system may be displaying this value, I was thinking of that but thaught i'd see if anyone had experenced it before. Thanks all the same. :) 

      Cheers

      • StephenB's avatar
        StephenB
        Guru - Experienced User

        new11 wrote:

        I suppose I should have said in my OP that I'm a little more curious as to why the system may be displaying this value,


        I get that.  I have seen this posted a couple of times before, but I don't know the cause.  The number happens to be 2**64 bytes (1 EiB).  That is the largest possible size of a BTRFS volume.

         

        My concern is that this might not be benign.  Something isn't quite right with your btrfs on-disk structures for that subvolume (i.e. share), and that could cause problems for you later on.  So if it were my system I'd be working to fix it, using the method I outlined above. 

NETGEAR Academy

Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology! 

Join Us!

ProSupport for Business

Comprehensive support plans for maximum network uptime and business peace of mind.

 

Learn More