NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
michelkenny
Sep 26, 2006Aspirant
Post your performance results
I thought it might be interesting to see what kind of performance everyone is getting with IO Meter so that we can compare what we're getting. So I thought we could all post our results in this thread for easy comparison.
You can run IO Meter by following the steps here: http://www.infrant.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=265
Please post your hardware specs, other relevant info, and IO Meter results. Maybe this could get stickied? Or ignored if no one cares :)
-------
Here's my info:
Stock NV
4 x Seagate ST3250823AS 250gb Hard Disk in X-RAID
All journaling disabled
Fast writes on
Intel D805 2.66ghz dual core cpu
Intel D945GNTLKR motherboard with onboard Intel Gigabit NIC
2 gigs ram
Seagate ST3250824AS 250gb Hard Disk
Windows Vista x86 RC1 (if that makes a difference)
Dell PowerConnect 2708 Gigabit switch (no jumbo frames)
Cat 6 cabling
IO Meter Write: 19.321793 MBps
IO Meter Read: 26.803979 MBps
You can run IO Meter by following the steps here: http://www.infrant.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=265
Please post your hardware specs, other relevant info, and IO Meter results. Maybe this could get stickied? Or ignored if no one cares :)
-------
Here's my info:
Stock NV
4 x Seagate ST3250823AS 250gb Hard Disk in X-RAID
All journaling disabled
Fast writes on
Intel D805 2.66ghz dual core cpu
Intel D945GNTLKR motherboard with onboard Intel Gigabit NIC
2 gigs ram
Seagate ST3250824AS 250gb Hard Disk
Windows Vista x86 RC1 (if that makes a difference)
Dell PowerConnect 2708 Gigabit switch (no jumbo frames)
Cat 6 cabling
IO Meter Write: 19.321793 MBps
IO Meter Read: 26.803979 MBps
308 Replies
Replies have been turned off for this discussion
- BikeHelmetAspirantI just upgraded to Windows 7, and now my NV+ gives me really good read speeds. :)
Model: ReadyNAS NV+ [X-RAID]
Firmware: RAIDiator 4.1.7 [1.00a043]
Memory: 1024 MB [2.5-3-3-7]
Volume C: Online, X-RAID, 2 disks, 99% of 1846 GB used
I have Teracopy installed. My read speeds are about 37-38MB/sec. Sometimes they spike as high as 47MB/sec, but it always bounces back to 37-38MB/sec right after.
Write speeds are much worse, but that could be due to how full the array is. Currently they average about 8-15MB/sec. I can remember them being as high as 25MB/sec under XP - but the array was almost empty when I first tested it. - royalefGuide
loquacious wrote: No matter what I try I cannot get tranfer speeds better than 11MB/s. I have changed cables, even disabled options that were recommended to be disabled to improve speed. The network status on my NAS frontview page says it is "Online / 1000 Mbit / full duplex but still only getting 11Mb / second transfer speeds from my internal hard drives to the NAS.
I have to say that, unfortunately, the industry is VERY SLOPPY about performance/speed where networking is concerned.
If the syntax of your abbreviations is correct, then you are getting a good rate.
MB and Mb are two completely different things, but constantly used interchangeably. They're not, never were. Microsoft is terrible about this and their bad habits have become the worlds. Performace in networking is ALWAYS measured in megabits, except by some companies such as Microsoft, who measures it in megabytes. Cheifly, because microsoft has always been sloppy to bad at networking.
There is no accurate conversion between Mb & MB because the first is basic measure of transmission (layer 1) and the other is the result from the perspective of an application (layer 7). To transfer 1 MB of data does NOT take 8Mb. And different protocols and apps will make that ratio vary. But because there is no right answer, we typically use say 1MB is equal to 8Mb. It is a guesstimate that gets you somewhere in the ballpark, but always short of the real Mb number. How short--you cant know.
So the 11MB rate you mention would be more than 88Mb on the wire. Over 60Mb there are always other factors that are probably constraining transfers. Are both client and server running at 1000 or 100? Are they on the same switch? If you are measuring a transfer of files what is the write speeds of the destination as write is always slower than read. Competing tasks? etc. - szleviAspirantModel: ReadyNAS Pro 6 [X-RAID2]
Serial: XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Firmware: RAIDiator 4.2.19
Memory: 1024 MB [6-6-6-18 DDR2]-----------------------Bonnie Results-----------------------------------------------
Version 1.96
Sequential Output | Sequential Input | Random Seeks | | Sequential Create | Random Create
Size Per Char Block Rewrite Per Char Block Num Files Create Read Delete Create Read Delete
K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU /sec %CPU /sec %CPU /sec %CPU /sec %CPU /sec %CPU /sec %CPU
2G 602 95 95706 13 42264 7 2292 97 135052 12 465.8 7 256 35243 71 362918 99 1968 3 33807 67 448574 99 1018 2
Latency 13741us 1405ms 250ms 20156us 46878us 356ms Latency 335ms 135us 9951ms 547ms 17us 11894ms
4087376+0 records in
4087376+0 records out
2092736512 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 22.0382 seconds, 95.0 MB/s- Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU E5300 @ 2.60GHz
Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU E5300 @ 2.60GHz
Host bridge: Intel Corporation Q963/Q965 Memory Controller Hub
VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Q963/Q965 Integrated Graphics Controller
(7x) USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801H
Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801H
(2x) PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801H
PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge
ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82801HB/HR
SATA controller: Intel Corporation 82801HB
SMBus: Intel Corporation 82801H
(2x) Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8053 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller
(2x) ATA Hitachi HDS72202 (Direct-Access)
USB Devices
none - CarnagedTutorHi all,
Just got a Duo V2 the other day and wanted to check in on the write speeds over a gigabit connection. I get between 57-60MB/s on a large MKV file, just wanted to check that sounds about right I couldnt find too many benchmarks online for it? - If you are able to get those write speeds then you are doing good. From the reviews I've read, most seem to top out at 35-50 MB/s write and ~90 MB/s read.
You must have a decent source computer.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5071/netg ... 2-review/3 - SereniityAspirantReadyNAS Ultra 6+ on a Full Duplex Gigabit Jumbo Packet network (Cat 6e, 9k JF + Billion 7800n), I get around 90 - 115mb/s read/write.
Rather happy with this speed, it's not like it needs to be faster :p
Great little device, expensive, but great. - kawaineAspirantI have ReadyNAS Ultra 4+
Full Duplex Gigabit Jumbo Frame (Cat 7, 9k MTU),
I get around Writes: 90~108 MB/s , Reads: 100~110 MB/s
It's performance very good - NottubAspirantHi, I'm only struggling with:
WRITE
Total I/O per second = 2.56
Total MB per second = 0.64
Average I/O Response time (ms) = 358.4287
Maximum I/O response time = 2515.4065
% CPU Utilization (total) = 4.77%
Total error count = 1
READ
Total I/O per second = 2.64
Total MB per second = 0.66
Average I/O Response time (ms) = 378.0300
Maximum I/O response time = 6039.6648
% CPU Utilization (total) = 3.55%
Total error count = 0
I have a NASDUO V2 with a (for the moment) single 2tB WD Caviar Green (WD20EARX) installed.
Very disappointing and I don't know what to do. Running the Iometer was a huge step in my knowledge.
Any suggestions?
Nottub :-( - NottubAspirantOK thought I would update you on a change made to my NIC from '100Mbps / Full Duplex' to 'Auto Negotiate 1000mbps'. Revised results in brackets....
WRITE
Total I/O per second = 2.56 [201.02]
Total MB per second = 0.64 [50.26]
Average I/O Response time (ms) = 358.4287 [4.79]
Maximum I/O response time = 2515.4065 [143.53]
% CPU Utilization (total) = 4.77% [44.13%]
Total error count = 1 [0]
READ
Total I/O per second = 2.64 [169.45]
Total MB per second = 0.66 [42.36]
Average I/O Response time (ms) = 378.0300 [5.89]
Maximum I/O response time = 6039.6648 [83.72]
% CPU Utilization (total) = 3.55% [30.21]
Total error count = 0 [0]
Seems to have done the trick....
Martyn. - tiranorAspirantWow, nice difference.
With my Ultra4 with jumbo frames off, i have :
Single Caviar Green 3TB on NAS :
-40MB/s Read&Write with CIFS/SMB access
-55-90MB/s Read and 55MB/s Write with ftp access
Current config (2 Seagate 3TB added) :
-45MB/s Read&Write with CIFS/SMB access
-60-95MB/s Read and 60MB/s Write with ftp access
With the current config, IOMeter gives me 50MB/s Read and 55MB/s Write.
I don't know if jumbo frames are worth the investment on my Ultra4 (I would need to buy at least a compatible NIC on my computer and a third GS105 switch, my router is said to support only 2k jumbo frames). FYI, iperf gives me a constant 110MB/s between my computer and my NAS.
Related Content
NETGEAR Academy

Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!