NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
anynamewilldo85
Apr 24, 2013Aspirant
Read Speed 3 x Slower than Write!!?
Hi
I have recently purchased a ready Nas duo v2 ( 2 x 3tb Seagate barracuda drives - flexraid 0)
Im seeing horrific read performance of around 1.5 MB/s where as write speed is around 4.5 MB/s
ReadyNas Duo V2 is connected to Sagemcom router (sky - fast Ethernet ports only) by what I presume is a cat5 cable included within the ready nas.
I am then connecting wirelessly from mylaptop. ( 300MB/s wireless network adapter)
Im totally stuck as to why read speed is 3 x slower than write speed, does anyone have any ideas where to look? ( there's not issue with the speed of the disks in my laptop as its using 2 SSD Drives (RAID 0) )
Any suggestions / ideas at all welcome
Thanks
I have recently purchased a ready Nas duo v2 ( 2 x 3tb Seagate barracuda drives - flexraid 0)
Im seeing horrific read performance of around 1.5 MB/s where as write speed is around 4.5 MB/s
ReadyNas Duo V2 is connected to Sagemcom router (sky - fast Ethernet ports only) by what I presume is a cat5 cable included within the ready nas.
I am then connecting wirelessly from mylaptop. ( 300MB/s wireless network adapter)
Im totally stuck as to why read speed is 3 x slower than write speed, does anyone have any ideas where to look? ( there's not issue with the speed of the disks in my laptop as its using 2 SSD Drives (RAID 0) )
Any suggestions / ideas at all welcome
Thanks
49 Replies
Replies have been turned off for this discussion
- StephenBGuru - Experienced UserI think the 4/5 MB -> 2 MB drop off is due to buffering. The real speed is the later, sustained one.
How fast is your broadband connection? If it is > 20 mbits downlink, you could try testing the read/downlink speed using the internet. Similarly for uplink. - dsm1212ApprenticeBeat me to it on the internet downlink suggestion :-). Compare wired vs wireless. Speedtest.net is good if you can't find another consistent server to use.
And turn off any antivirus on the PC. Incoming packets get inspected...
steve - StephenBGuru - Experienced UserA fast file server would be better than speedtest, but we should take what we can get...
Turning off antivirus makes sense, I had assumed it wasn't in the way since the wired speeds are symmetric. Though 7 MB/s is a bit pokey there too, I'd expect 8-9 on wired 100 mbit ethernet. - anynamewilldo85Aspirantwired read = 7.5 MB/s
wired write = 7.5MB/s
wireless read = 2MB/s (this Is the problem)
wireless write = 5MB/s
remote connection over internet read = 1.5 MB/s
remote connection over internet read = 0.5 MB/s
tried turning off antivirus and firewall - no change - StephenBGuru - Experienced User
I'm thinking this last one would be write????anynamewilldo85 wrote:
remote connection over internet read = 1.5 MB/s
remote connection over internet read = 0.5 MB/s
That would be 12 mbs downlink, 512 kbs uplink service - not fast enough to help isolate this problem. - anynamewilldo85Aspirantsorry yes last one should be write
- StephenBGuru - Experienced UserAny other WiFi gadgets?
- ihartleyTutorbwm is available via apt for checking bandwidth. But in all reality, the weak link is the 100Mb ethernet.
If you're using Windows you could use some TCP tweaks to make the window bigger, that might help.
I would speedtest from wlan, from fixed lan and connected directly to router. Then maybe you can see the bottleneck. Also depends whether the 100Mb is full duplex or not. - StephenBGuru - Experienced UserOP's issue is on the wifi link not the fast ethernet. He's getting approximately expected results on the fast ethernet (symmetric 7.5 MB/s goodput). I'd expect closer to 10, but I don't see how the wired link will create the asymmetric behavior on Wifi.
WiFi uplink speed is in line with typical 802.11n performance, but the downlink speed is only reaching 802.11g performance levels. He also has a 1500 byte MTU end to end, so there isn't any packet fragmentation. I think he's already done the speed tests you are talking about, though I am not sure what you mean by "directly connected to router". Did you mean "direct connect PC to NAS"?
I am also not seeing much reason to try and tweak TCP. Usually that is only helpful if the network path has a very large bandwidth-delay product, there's no evidence that he has that (and it seems unlikely given his equipment). If you don't know what you are doing there, you are likely to do more harm than good.
anynamewilldo85 - are you using the default windows settings, or did you tweak them (either on your own, or with a TCP optimizer program)?
Also, do you have any 802.11b or 802.11g devices connected to the router? A smartphone, or a wireless printer, for example?
If he had another PC or network storage device on either the LAN or the WiFi network, he could possibly do some more isolation. W/o that, I am not seeing any obvious way to do any further diagnosis. One could throw some equipment at it (a gigabit switch combined with a faster 802.11 access point). Though if the router is throttling back WiFi xmit for some reason (due to the "good neighbour policies") it might not help. - anynamewilldo85AspirantHI
Not touched windows settings
Occasionally will have a phone connected to wifi - however all tests have been carried out with the phone's wifi turned off
Related Content
NETGEAR Academy

Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!