NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.

Forum Discussion

ukbobboy's avatar
ukbobboy
Luminary
Aug 15, 2015
Solved

ReadyNAS - Transcoding and Non-Transcoding

Dear Forum Members & Experts

 

This query is more of a general observation than anything but please let me know if I have got it wrong.

 

From what I understand, if I am looking for a ReadyNAS to stream videos Netgear adverts seem to imply that all a user has to do is download plex (PMS) from the Netgear (add-on) store, install it and away you go.

 

What the advert does not say, or indicate, is that version of PMS is for an Intel CPU enabled ReadyNAS and not the ARM installed RN units.

 

Very confusing for a newby, in fact unless a user has a clear idea of what version of RN meets his current and future requirements he can find himself going down the wrong "technical solution" road. Come to think of it, I do not recall any Netgear advert differentiating between an Intel or ARM enabled RN, and only found out myself after purchasing my machine and started working through my list of priorities (I didn't even know what "transcoding" was until my "TV streaming" priority came up).

 

I guess, what I am saying is that with a diverse options of RN on offer Netgear should do more to let users know which models are suitable for what range of jobs. Instead of by omission, as it is now, pretending that all the RN units, with the exception if disk capacity, are the same.

 

 

UK Bob

  • I think a lot of confusion is caused by past mistakes (notably the v1 and v2 mess).  

     

    The new platforms are much simpler to sort through.  RN100, RN200, RN300, RN500, RN700 are all desktop models, and large numbers are always more capable than the smaller numbers.  

     

    There are two comparison sheets (RN100, RN200; and also for RN300-RN700).  It would be better if there was a single comparison sheet though, since the home/business distinction is somewhat artificial.

     

    The 4 digit models aren't as clean, since there were existing model numbers in the way.  I think I would have used a different framework for those (maybe 5 digits, or putting an R at the end of the 4 digits).

6 Replies

Replies have been turned off for this discussion

NETGEAR Academy

Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology! 

Join Us!

ProSupport for Business

Comprehensive support plans for maximum network uptime and business peace of mind.

 

Learn More