This topic has been marked solved and closed to new posts due to inactivity. We hope you'll join the conversation by posting to an open topic or starting a new one.
How many devices would be necessary to benefit from tri-band
I understand the marketing of the Tri-Band systems vs the Dual Band Systems emphasizes the third band is used for "backhaul" and decongests the 5 Ghz band to be used for devices.
However I wonder how many devices would be necessary before you would see the benefits of the extra 5 Ghz Channel?
I can't forsee having more than 20 devices in our household which would be turned on at the same time ... perhaps 3 TV's streaming, 3 or 4 notebook computers and 3 or 4 iPads and a few iPhones and Android phones.
So weighing that against the range of a MK63-100NAS of 4500 sq. ft. Dual Band System vs the advertised range of 2500 sq. ft. of a Tri-Band System such as an AX8 RAX 78-100NAS, it seems questionable whether the benefits of the Tri-Band system would outweigh the shorter range capabilities of the Tri-Band system, if you didn't have a lot of clients.
I decided to go with the Orbi Mesh RBK753S-100NAS for the reasons you mentioned. It is more expensive but at least I will have less chance of being disappointed.
In the end being satisfied with the performance is preferable to saving some money and being disappointd and mad later.
