NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Need new router 2.5 Gps on all ports
Does anyone know of a router that has 2.5 Gbs+ wan and lan ports for less than $300? VPN would be nice but not necessary. Does not have to be wireless either. Thank you very much! Could be a business or home router. For the life of me I don't understand why they are separate in sales and in forums since you could (and I have on many occasions) certainly buy a business router for home use. Do I need to post this again under home routers? Thanks again!Multiple private networks from one ISP for IOT, and wired devices and wireless devices and guest.
Looking for a solution to secure wired computers from wireless devices and seperate IOT devices. Wanting more security to separate devices with multiple radios, to secure security devices like ring devices, nest thermostats.... Need help finding the best solution.srx5308- attached devices
first of all i thank all of you helping out here. i m new using the netgear and i have netgear prosafe gigabit quad wan ssl vpn firewall srx5308. i would like to see all the attached devices basically from the users computers to the internet in order to troubleshoot my issues. thanks again My Setup (Cable 200Mb/10Mb)>C7800(Modem Mode)>RBK50 Additional NG HW: CM1100/1200, Orbi CBK40(Gateway Mode)BR500 router upgrade firmware to 5.5.0.1 from 5.1.0.15 no longer connects to Insight
BR500 router upgrade firmware to 5.5.0.1 from 5.1.0.15 and it no longer connects to Insight Cloud. One thing I did notice when I went to look in the logs was the BR500 was reporting dates of May 31, 2017 yesterday and June 1, 2017 today. My first inclination is to try to put 5.5 update on again. Thoughts----BR500 - Management Access from internal VLAN
Insight BR500 VPN Firewall Router We have a BR500 router and GC728P switch that are set up with Insight. Some of the BR500 features are not available via Insight, so we connect directly to the BR500. The BR500 management page is accessible from a client on VLAN-1 (LAN1 172.23.1.0/24) only. There are other VLANs on the router and switch. Each of the VLANs is working as expected. I would like to be able to get access to the managmement web page from VLAN-10 (LAN4) with subnet 172.23.10.0/24. When I am connected to a switchport with VLAN-10 as the access (untagged), the message on the browser is: 404 Not Found This server does not support the operation requested by your client. When connected to a switchport on VLAN-1, or directly to a port on the BR500, I can access the page. I have added and ACL on the BR500 to allow LAN4 to communicate to LAN1, but that did not make a difference. VLAN trunking between the switch and router appears to be correct as there are WAC505's with WiFi working fine. Can the BR500 be accessed from anywhere other than the default management VLAN-1/LAN1? Thanks!UTM50 RESET and Firmware Update Failing -Device Abandoned!!!
Hi there, This is a continuation of the UTM abandonement thread: https://community.netgear.com/t5/Hardware-VPN-Firewalls-and/ProSecure-UTM9S/td-p/1028499 I am using a device from the same family (UTM50) and had to do a hard reset on the device today. Now nothing is working and our whole company is down. I am not able to extend trial licenses or do firmware updates. PLEASE HELP! Can you enable trial license for 30 days so I can do a firmware update and get the device working? Thanks!One firewall creating multiple networks that can not see eachother
I would like to configure a network like this: Using the SRX5308 firewall and a netgear switch with VLAN support. This should be simple, but i can not find any way in the manual of the SRX to configure so that each VLAN can reach the internet but none of the VLANS can see eachother. Additionally i can not determine if i can create firewall rules in the SRX that will be specific for one VLAN (say i wanted to open certain traffic to one VLAN and not to another.) The reason for this setup is that i want to divide a network in a small company for security reasons, and i do not want to use multiple firewalls as that leaves me with double-nat problems later on. Thanks for any help in advance :-) Best regards Kristoffer Can someone verify if this can be done
