NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
volume
8 TopicsInaccurate reporting of used/free volume space?
Hi, may anybody now why the "Data" volume shows the following strange negative space and only the snapshot space is shown? FW is 6.9.3 I can access my data using win10 explorer. Data seem to be there. Furthermore the backup share shows a strange figure for the consumed space, too: Thanks for any help:smileyhappy: CarstenSolved2.4KViews0likes8CommentsReadyNAS Hardware Performance
Hello, Currently have a ReadyNAS 4 bay model 314 is has 2 Western Digital 4T drives and 2 Western Digital 6T drives installed I have been trying to increase the perfromance of this device i.e ready/write speed. The devices are connected via a ISP modem Router rates at 1gigbit ethernet my issue recently has been with writing and deleting from this device has been slow. The network computers are iMac's running OSX 10.12.6 connected via gigabit ethernet. I have traced all possible avenues of where the speed can been effected the buiding's wired with Cat5e ethernet good cable. Also I notice that the device when booting slows when it reaches about 80% and seems to be working hard accessing the drives during boot with nothing to account for this. So I decided to wipe the drives and reinstall factory settings that strips the disks using X-RAiD. Duing the intiall factory reset the device decided to run Resyncing since their is no data on the drives I was wondering why. I also notice a chart in the Volume's menu under setting then select RAID it shows a triangle chart that on each point of the chart indicating three states of the Raid Volume. One state shows Performance in yellow and with a completion circle indicating decreased I assume. I was wondering if my having 2 different Harddrive sizes installed caused degredation of the Volume perfromance and this chart is show that. Would their be any advantage to change the drives to all the same size.Problème de volume après panne de disque sur ReadyNAS Ultra 2 RNDU2000
Bonjour la communauté Netgear !!! J'ai un problème concernant mon serveur NAS ReadNAS ultra 2 (2 HDD * 2Teraoctets synchronisés en X-RAID pour le partage de mes données). Il y a quelques jours, j'ai eu une panne de disque. Je ne m'en suis rendu compte quelques temps après en tentant de me connecter à mes partages réseaux. J'ai aussitôt été voir dans l'interface d'administration du NAS et les logs indiquaient : "The paths for the shares listed below could not be found. Typically, this occurs when the readyNAS is unable to access the data volume. .....<liste de mes partages>....". J'ai donc été voir dans la gestion des volumes mais j'ai directement eu une pop-up d'erreur indiquant qu'aucun volume n'est présent... Du coup, impossible de gérer mes partages. En me connectant en SSH sur le NAS, j'ai exécuté la commande "fdisk -l" pour lister les partitions et est constaté que seules 2 partitions sont présentes, il manque à priori la partition où se trouvent les données. J'ai essayé de monter plusieurs partitions à la main (mount /dev/sda* /c/*) mais rien y fait. J'ai changé de disque en mettant un nouveau de même capacité. Celui-ci est bien reconnu mais le NAS ne me trouve toujours aucun volume... Est-il possible que ce soit une sécurité de Netgear (technologie X-RAID) le fait que l'on puisse pas voir le volume si un des disques est défectueux ? Comment résoudre ce problème ? Est-ce que le X-RAID (RAID 1 de Netgear) est visible sur Linux (GParted, Ubuntu ou autre) ? Toutes mes données personnelles et photos de famille y sont présentes et j'aurai du mal à digérer le fait de tout perdre... :smileyfrustrated: Si quelqu'un a déjà eu ce genre de problème ou a une solution pour y remédier, je suis preneur !!! PS : Mon NAS est bien entendu plus sous garantie (depuis quelques années déjà). Vous remerciant par avance.Solved6.3KViews0likes14CommentsBalance failed to start for volume data
This morning, my email notification reported the following error: "Volume: Balance failed to start for volume data." I searched for this message on the community forum, and the documentation, but no reference to this specific message. What does it mean? What action is required. Here's the last three days of log info:Solved4.3KViews0likes10CommentsNeed help: System volume root's usage is 100%
Dear community, I have serious issue with my ReadyNAS 102. Currenrly my ROOT volume usage is 100%, resulting in not being able to access the Frontview and all kind of instabilty in the accessibility of my shared locations and installed apps. Also my MEDIA volume has less than 5% capacity resulting in instability issues. Who can help and support me in getting this issue solved? Find enclosed my logs: Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on udev 10M 4.0K 10M 1% /dev /dev/md0 4.0G 2.4G 1.4G 65% / tmpfs 249M 0 249M 0% /dev/shm tmpfs 249M 528K 248M 1% /run tmpfs 125M 0 125M 0% /run/lock tmpfs 249M 0 249M 0% /sys/fs/cgroup /dev/md127 462G 245G 216G 54% /Storage_2 /dev/md126 927G 762G 140G 85% /data /dev/md126 927G 762G 140G 85% /apps /dev/md126 927G 762G 140G 85% /home /dev/md127 462G 245G 216G 54% /run/nfs4/Storage_2/Documenten_2 /dev/md127 462G 245G 216G 54% /run/nfs4/Storage_2/Movies_2 /dev/md126 927G 762G 140G 85% /run/nfs4/data/Music /dev/md127 462G 245G 216G 54% /run/nfs4/Storage_2/Music_2 /dev/md126 927G 762G 140G 85% /run/nfs4/data/Pictures /dev/md127 462G 245G 216G 54% /run/nfs4/Storage_2/Shows_2 /dev/md126 927G 762G 140G 85% /run/nfs4/data/Transmission /dev/md126 927G 762G 140G 85% /run/nfs4/data/Videos udev 63155 392 62763 1% /dev /dev/md0 65536 65536 0 100% / tmpfs 63590 1 63589 1% /dev/shm tmpfs 63590 542 63048 1% /run tmpfs 63590 3 63587 1% /run/lock tmpfs 63590 9 63581 1% /sys/fs/cgroup /dev/md127 0 0 0 - /Storage_2 /dev/md126 0 0 0 - /data /dev/md126 0 0 0 - /apps /dev/md126 0 0 0 - /home /dev/md127 0 0 0 - /run/nfs4/Storage_2/Documenten_2 /dev/md127 0 0 0 - /run/nfs4/Storage_2/Movies_2 /dev/md126 0 0 0 - /run/nfs4/data/Music /dev/md127 0 0 0 - /run/nfs4/Storage_2/Music_2 /dev/md126 0 0 0 - /run/nfs4/data/Pictures /dev/md127 0 0 0 - /run/nfs4/Storage_2/Shows_2 /dev/md126 0 0 0 - /run/nfs4/data/Transmission /dev/md126 0 0 0 - /run/nfs4/data/Videos 4.0K /var/agentx 64M /var/backups 625M /var/cache 27M /var/cores 4.0K /var/ftp 210M /var/lib 4.0K /var/local 792K /var/lock 69M /var/log 4.0K /var/mail 11M /var/netatalk 4.0K /var/opt 12K /var/readydrop 2.0M /var/readynasd 0 /var/run 20K /var/spool 4.0K /var/tmp 8.0K /var/www 1005M total Any help is welcome! Cheers, Fremske3.1KViews0likes1CommentProblem umount volume after one disk failure on RNDU2000 #27445297
Hello Netgear Community!!! First, I apologize for my english (I'm french). I've got a problem on my ReadyNAS Ultra 2 (2 * 2 terabyte) sync on X-RAID to mirroring my datas between my 2 HDD. A few days ago, one HDD has failed. Later, unable to connect to nas shares. I immediatly look at the logs and I see : "The paths for the shares listed below could not be found. Typically, this occurs when the readyNAS is unable to access the data volume. .....<list of the shares>....". I then go in the volume management menu and I see an other pop-up error who accurate no volume is mounted. I decide to connect through SSH. When I list disk partitions (fdisk -l), I note that the partition that contains the datas is not present. I've tried to mount many partitions that I see into /dev without success. My questions are : - Is there someone who has had this problem or almost the same ? - How to solve it ? - Is it possible to read X-RAID disk on ubuntu system, GParted or other linux distribution ? I think it's a firmware problem when the nas mounting volumes, or a security of its system (X-RAID) that stop the mounting of volumes as the failed HDD has not be changed. My readynas contains 12 years of family pics, personal documents and working files, so I will be disappointed to have lost everything. Thank's a lot If you have the solution !!! By3.4KViews0likes2CommentsVolumes Name Conflict (error code 1014020000)
Hiello, I'm running 3 x RAID1 Volumes on a RN31600. I needed to upgrade one of the Volume (DISK_1) to a bigger capacity but don't want to "Destroy" the volume in case something goes wrong in my backup and I need to reinstall the volume again. I made a backup of "DISK_1" on an external USB, removed the 2 disks belonging to the RAID1 volume "DISK_1" , plugged in 2 new disk with a bigger capacity and format them. In order to keep our worflow running smoothly I wish to re-use the name "DISK_1" for the new RAID1 volume. Unfortunatelly I got a error code 1014020000 " A Volume with the specified name already exist in the system" when trying to assign the name "DISK_1" to a new RAID1 Volume. Is there anyway I can re-use a volume name without destroying the previous volume? PascalSolved3.5KViews0likes2CommentsVolumes Name Conflict (error code 1014020000)
Hiello, I'm running 3 x RAID1 Volumes on a RN31600. I needed to upgrade one of the Volume (DISK_1) to a bigger capacity but don't want to "Destroy" the volume in case something goes wrong in my backup and I need to reinstall the volume again. I made a backup of "DISK_1" on an external USB, removed the 2 disks belonging to the RAID1 volume "DISK_1" , plugged in 2 new disk with a bigger capacity and format them. In order to keep our worflow running smoothly I wish to re-use the name "DISK_1" for the new RAID1 volume. Unfortunatelly I got a error code 1014020000 " A Volume with the specified name already exist in the system" when trying to assign the name "DISK_1" to a new RAID1 Volume. Is there anyway I can re-use a volume name without destroying the previous volume? Pascal2.8KViews0likes2Comments