NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.

Forum Discussion

bikerglasses's avatar
bikerglasses
Aspirant
Feb 09, 2018

C6250-100NAS model --can this be configured to work with Century Link 100?

Thinking of switching to Century Link fiber.  They're offering 100mbps, price locked, no contract for $65 compared to the 50mpbs I'm paying with Cox and they're increasing the cost every year.

 

Would I be able to use my netgear cable/router combo [C6250-100NAS] or have to switch to their supplied router [zyxEL C3000Z]?

 

Thanks,

Ian

 

3 Replies

  • > Would I be able to use my netgear cable/router combo [C6250-100NAS] or
    > have to switch to their supplied router [zyxEL C3000Z]?

       You can't use the C6250.  Netgear C6250: Cable-TV.  Zyxel C3000Z:

    DSL.

          http://internethelp.centurylink.com/internethelp/pdf/modems/data-sheet-C3000Z.pdf

       Note the (green) telephone connector.  That does not mean that you
    must use the CenturyLink-supplied device.  Netgear (among others) offers
    various DSL modems/routers which might work, depending on which DSL
    features you'll be using.

          # VDSL2 (G.993.2) Bonding
            - 200Mbps/100Mbps* down/up data rates
            - Bonding mode: 8a, 8b, 8c, 8d, 12a, 12b,
               17a profiles

       I don't remember seeing a Netgear DSL gizmo which handles "bonding".
    (Which is not a nonexistence proof.)

    • bikerglasses's avatar
      bikerglasses
      Aspirant

      Thanks for the reply.

       

      Since I'll have to buy a new router, I'd rather get something better then spending the $150 on the Zyxel C3000Z.  I was told that the NETGEAR - Nighthawk X4S Wireless-AC Dual-Band Wi-Fi Router - Black - Model: R7800-100NAS will work with Century Link Fiber.  I was also thinking of the NETGEAR Nighthawk X6 AC3200 Tri-Band Gigabit WiFi Router (R8000) - "R8000-100NAS".

       

      Any opinions on those 2 Netgear routers.  My install is set for next Thursday.

      • antinode's avatar
        antinode
        Guru

        > [...] I was told [...]

           Whom do you trust?

        > [...] R7800-100NAS will work with Century Link Fiber.

           An R7800 is a router, not a DSL modem+router.  As a router, it will
        work with almost Internet service, but as a DSL modem, it's entirely
        useless.  (It ain't got one.)  You seem to need some kind of DSL modem,
        and some kind of (probably wireless) router.  You could get a combined
        unit like the Zyxel C3000Z, or a Netgear DSL modem+router whose model
        number starts with "D" (not "R").  Alternatively, you could get separate
        DSL modem and (any-old) router units.

           I use a Netgear D7000 with my old/slow CenturyLink ADSL service.  As
        I said, the Zyxel C3000Z has some DSL features ("bonding") which
        some/many Netgear DSL gizmos (like my D7000) lack.  I don't know if your
        CenturyLink DSL service will use that feature.  Now would be a good time
        to find out.  CenturyLink should be able to tell you what level of DSL
        service you've ordered (ADSL/ADSL2/ADSL2+/VDSL/VDSL2/..., bonding, ...),
        but I'd guess that they won't recommend any modems/routers other than
        what they sell.  When you've got the actual DSL requirements, then a Web
        search may find some information from people who have actual experience
        with (modern) CenturyLink DSL service and various modems, routers,
        and/or modem+routers.

        > Any opinions on those 2 Netgear routers. [...]

           I do know that Netgear "Rxxxx" models lack a DSL modem, and you'd
        seem to need one.  Beyond that, I try not to recommend specific gizmos
        of any kind when I know not much about the target environment, and even
        less about most of what Netgear makes.  Skimming over these forums will
        find a discouraging number of complaints about almost any Netgear
        product.  (But, back when I tried to use a ZyXEL/CenturyLink PK5001Z,
        its DSL modem section was ok, but its router was too lame to do anything
        like what I needed.  Everything's complicated.)