NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
MrCyberdude
Apr 15, 2010Tutor
2TB WD20EARS HCL Advanced Format 4k Sectors TLER LCC WDidle3
EDIT: This thread was written before the Readynas group had recognized and addressed the WD Advanced Format HDD's. An issue that remains to this day is the massive LCC(Load Cycle Count) increases due ...
MrCyberdude
Jun 06, 2010Tutor
It looks as if 4.2.12:T9 Firmware for x86 should align the 4KB sectors. I'm in the middle of re-syncing each HDD.
Another really good article on 4KB sector
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-4kb-sector-disks/index.html

Another really good article on 4KB sector
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-4kb-sector-disks/index.html
Write performance penalty for using unaligned partitions
Aligning RAID partitions
Redundant array of independent disks (RAID) levels 5 and 6 have alignment issues similar to those of Advanced Format drives, but the causes relate to the size of data stripes used to create the array, typically 16KB to 256KB. When using RAID arrays, you should align partitions on multiples of the stripe size. The default alignment on 2048 sectors (1024KB) that is emerging as a new standard works well with all common RAID stripe sizes.
Published test results indicate a performance penalty of about 5-30% for improper alignment, which is much less than the penalty for improperly aligning an Advanced Format drive. When creating a RAID array from Advanced Format disks, you don't need to take any extra steps. Because the RAID alignment values are multiples of the 4096-byte alignment required by Advanced Format drives, both technologies' needs are met if you align partitions as for a RAID array of disks with 512-byte physical sectors.

Related Content
NETGEAR Academy
Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!