NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.

Forum Discussion

Ken6432-1's avatar
Mar 20, 2026

Looking for feedback on ReadyNAS-Alpine OS

I am curious to know if anyone would provide some feedback on how stable ReadyNAS-Alpine is?  Is its current version good enough for use on a primary ReadyNAS device (personal, not business use)?

 

I haven't found any other alternatives to this for an OS upgrade.  Have I missed others that exist?

 

Thanks in advance

5 Replies

  • Thanks, portalman​ and @StephenB for the feedback.  Since I use all of my ReadyNAS boxes as just file servers, I'll stick with the stock OS.  I'm still trying to decide on how to do a virus scan on them, but other than that they are working fine

  • I'm running a 516, with a maxed out CPU - so there's loads of power that it feels like I should exploit, so I do have some workloads directly on the NAS.  But nothing that serves the internet.  I do that elsewhere with newer software/hardware.

  • Do you mean this one, released 3 years ago and not touched since? 

    https://github.com/RustyDust/readynas-alpine

     

    If so, it's quite a high risk strategy.  

     

    I guess providing the script is functional and it correctly converts the NAS, you are away - but I doubt the community using Alpine is massive, and unless you're a strong Alpine sys admin, you'll probably hit issues later with upgrades etc and you'll never wish you went down this route.

     

    I also see no mention of coverage for usual issues such as fan control, LCD displays etc

     

    I've yet to find an alternative OS that does the job 100%.  My recommendation is stick to ReadyNAS OS6.  Just use it as a file server.  If you are doing more, extend the life by using containers.  Be cautious around security etc, and you should be fine for a while yet.

    • StephenB's avatar
      StephenB
      Guru - Experienced User
      portalman wrote:

      My recommendation is stick to ReadyNAS OS6.  Just use it as a file server.  If you are doing more, extend the life by using containers.  Be cautious around security etc, and you should be fine for a while yet.

      FWIW, I agree with this advice.  Though personally I am running a separate application server (with the NAS data volume mounted on it) instead of using a container.  ReadyNAS hardware is robust, but is pretty old now, and IMO is reaching the point where you should consider a new NAS if you want more than a file server.

       

      Though some folks have posted instructions on rehosting on a alternative OS, and if you have the skills and desire to explore, then that is another path.

      • portalman's avatar
        portalman
        Aspirant

        I'm running a 516, with a maxed out CPU - so there's loads of power that it feels like I should exploit, so I do have some workloads directly on the NAS.  But nothing that serves the internet.  I do that elsewhere with newer software/hardware.

NETGEAR Academy

Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology! 

Join Us!

ProSupport for Business

Comprehensive support plans for maximum network uptime and business peace of mind.

 

Learn More