NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Installation & Upgrade
622 TopicsLooking for feedback on ReadyNAS-Alpine OS
I am curious to know if anyone would provide some feedback on how stable ReadyNAS-Alpine is? Is its current version good enough for use on a primary ReadyNAS device (personal, not business use)? I haven't found any other alternatives to this for an OS upgrade. Have I missed others that exist? Thanks in advanceSolvedRN104: ghost “NG-8TB-Seagate” volume (RAID unknown) Inactive/Unprotected
I have a ReadyNAS RN104 that’s working fine from the data point of view, but the volume configuration seems corrupted and is generating constant volume health alerts that I cannot clear. I’m hoping someone familiar with the ReadyNAS OS 6 config DB can advise on a safe way to remove the ghost volume entries without wiping any data. Hardware / firmware: • Model: RN104 • OS version: 6.10.10 • Disks: • sda: 2 TB (NG-WDRED-2TB-1) • sdb: 6 TB (NG-WDRP-6TB-1) • sdc: 3 TB (NG-WDRED-3TB-2) • sdd: 8 TB (NG-8TB-Seagate) – recently replaced a failed 3 TB Symptom: In the web UI → System → Volumes I see 6 volumes even though I only have 4 disks. The top four are green JBOD volumes with data and look healthy: • NG-8TB-Seagate (JBOD, ~7.27 TB, ~2.64 TB used) • NG-WDRED-3TB-2 (JBOD, ~2.72 TB, ~1.17 TB used) • NG-WDRP-6TB-1 (JBOD, ~5.45 TB, ~4.28 TB used) • NG-WDRED-2TB-1 (JBOD, ~1.81 TB, ~0.2 TB used) Below those, there are two blue entries with 0 data and “RAID unknown”: • NG-WDRED-3TB-1 (0 data, 0 free, RAID unknown) • NG-8TB-Seagate (0 data, 0 free, RAID unknown)RN104: ghost “NG-8TB-Seagate” volume (RAID unknown) flapping Inactive/Unprotected
Hi all, I have a ReadyNAS RN104 that’s working fine from the data point of view, but the volume configuration seems corrupted and is generating constant volume health alerts that I cannot clear. I’m hoping someone familiar with the ReadyNAS OS 6 config DB can advise on a safe way to remove the ghost volume entries without wiping any data. Hardware / firmware: - Model: RN104 - OS version: 6.10.10 - Disks: - sda: 2 TB (NG-WDRED-2TB-1) - sdb: 6 TB (NG-WDRP-6TB-1) - sdc: 3 TB (NG-WDRED-3TB-2) - sdd: 8 TB (NG-8TB-Seagate) – recently replaced a failed 3 TB Symptom: In the web UI → System → Volumes I see 6 volumes even though I only have 4 disks. The top four are green JBOD volumes with data and look healthy: - NG-8TB-Seagate (JBOD, ~7.27 TB, ~2.64 TB used) - NG-WDRED-3TB-2 (JBOD, ~2.72 TB, ~1.17 TB used) - NG-WDRP-6TB-1 (JBOD, ~5.45 TB, ~4.28 TB used) - NG-WDRED-2TB-1 (JBOD, ~1.81 TB, ~0.2 TB used) Below those, there are two blue entries with 0 data and “RAID unknown”: - NG-WDRED-3TB-1 (0 data, 0 free, RAID unknown) - NG-8TB-Seagate (0 data, 0 free, RAID unknown) I believe these are stale/ghost volumes from the old failed 3 TB drive and some mis-step when I first added the 8 TB. They show only “Disk test” and “Destroy” as options. When I try “Destroy” on the old 3 TB entry, it appears to succeed but the entry comes straight back. In the logs I constantly get messages like: - “Volume: Volume NG-8TB-Seagate health changed from Inactive to Unprotected.” - “Volume: Volume NG-8TB-Seagate health changed from Unprotected to Inactive.” These repeat every few seconds/minutes and are clearly coming from the ghost NG-8TB-Seagate entry (the 0-data, RAID-unknown one), not the real 8 TB JBOD volume which is mounted and in use. SSH diagnostics (all arrays look clean): lsblk sda 1.8T ├─sda1 -> md0 (/) ├─sda2 -> md1 (swap) └─sda3 -> md126 /NG-WDRED-2TB-1 sdb 5.5T ├─sdb1 -> md0 (/) ├─sdb2 -> md1 (swap) └─sdb3 -> md127 /NG-WDRP-6TB-1 sdc 2.7T ├─sdc1 -> md0 ├─sdc2 -> md1 └─sdc3 -> md125 /NG-WDRED-3TB-2 sdd 7.3T ├─sdd1 -> md0 ├─sdd2 -> md1 └─sdd3 -> md124 /NG-8TB-Seagate /proc/mdstat md124 : active raid1 sdd3 7809175808 blocks super 1.2 [1/1] [U] md125 : active raid1 sdc3 2925415808 blocks super 1.2 [1/1] [U] md126 : active raid1 sda3 1948663808 blocks super 1.2 [1/1] [U] md127 : active raid1 sdb3 5855671808 blocks super 1.2 [1/1] [U] md1 : active raid10 sda2 sdd2 sdc2 sdb2[1][2][3] 1044480 blocks super 1.2 512K chunks 2 near-copies [4/4] [UUUU] md0 : active raid1 sda1 sdb1 sdd1 sdc1[3][4][1] 4190208 blocks super 1.2 [4/4] [UUUU] /root/mdadm-detail-scan.txt ARRAY /dev/md/0 metadata=1.2 name=0e34093c:0 UUID=b1079eff:ca275c6a:4df7d648:6f176c9c ARRAY /dev/md/1 metadata=1.2 name=0e34093c:1 UUID=9ecdbab8:7ecf3da9:299f9966:0fa46d04 ARRAY /dev/md/NG-WDRP-6TB-1-0 metadata=1.2 name=0e34093c:NG-WDRP-6TB-1-0 UUID=1d40ffff:601db1f8:20e41e54:f5650fa6 ARRAY /dev/md/NG-WDRED-2TB-1-0 metadata=1.2 name=0e34093c:NG-WDRED-2TB-1-0 UUID=d69ab251:67e359ac:16c640ee:2a0409c0 ARRAY /dev/md/NG-WDRED-3TB-2-0 metadata=1.2 name=0e34093c:NG-WDRED-3TB-2-0 UUID=1c072ab5:ea01a5d6:646d6d07:76776925 ARRAY /dev/md/NG-8TB-Seagate-0 metadata=1.2 name=0e34093c:NG-8TB-Seagate-0 UUID=4a957007:c3c04e0b:0aacb1df:3a59d9e8 /root/btrfs-filesystems.txt Label: '0e34093c:NG-WDRP-6TB-1' uuid: 28fcc8ab-9e63-4529-83f4-1e9d4708bd1b Total devices 1 FS bytes used 4.27TiB devid 1 size 5.45TiB used 4.28TiB path /dev/md127 Label: '0e34093c:NG-8TB-Seagate' uuid: 2a912336-755a-48e6-bcee-fd373ae8e6df Total devices 1 FS bytes used 2.63TiB devid 1 size 7.27TiB used 2.64TiB path /dev/md124 Label: '0e34093c:NG-WDRED-3TB-2' uuid: fbd95853-4f22-4041-8583-4e0853decf9b Total devices 1 FS bytes used 1.17TiB devid 1 size 2.72TiB used 1.17TiB path /dev/md125 Label: '0e34093c:NG-WDRED-2TB-1' uuid: 1b34cda6-1cc8-4360-9ca6-4c209100aa48 Total devices 1 FS bytes used 200.08GiB devid 1 size 1.81TiB used 220.02GiB path /dev/md126 So from the RAID/Btrfs point of view, everything looks consistent: four md data arrays, four Btrfs filesystems, all mounted and in use. There is no extra md device and no Btrfs filesystem corresponding to the blue “RAID unknown” ghost NG-8TB-Seagate volume. What I’ve tried: - Using the GUI “Destroy” on the blue NG-WDRED-3TB-1 volume: it disappears briefly but comes back. - Running btrfs scrub on the real NG-8TB-Seagate volume. - Restarting services and rebooting; the ghost entries and the Inactive/Unprotected log spam persist. What I’m asking for: I’d like guidance on how to safely clean up the configuration/database so that the ghost NG-8TB-Seagate and NG-WDRED-3TB-1 volumes are removed from the ReadyNAS UI and stop generating volume-health events, without destroying the real md124/md125/md126/md127 arrays or their Btrfs filesystems. I’m comfortable with SSH and sqlite3 if needed, but I don’t know the internal ReadyNAS schema, so I’d really appreciate precise instructions like: - which DB file to open; - which table(s)/row(s) represent these phantom volumes; - exactly what to delete/change; - and which services to restart afterwards. I do have backups of the most critical data, but I’d obviously prefer not to wipe and rebuild the entire box just to clear two stale volume objects. Thanks in advance for any pointers.ReadyNas Pro -100
Acquired an Old ReadyNas pro 6 -100 it is running OS6 6.10.9 2GB memory and the 1.8ghz processor Bios is version 1.6 I'd like to update the Bios to version 2.0 for the higher speed FSB memory and Xeon proc. I've stepped through the various bios update pages and continue to fall short on loading the proper updates. I've successfully uppacked the ROM files but when attempting the update or install the dmidecod and flashrom are not available. nor is the libc6.i386. I've attempted to update sources.lists via the old FTP debian Wheezer main non-free and the http://www.deb-multimedia.org non of these pages appear to provide the updated information / install or I'm missing something along the way. Any guidance would be very helpful as I've exhausted my knowledge of next possbile steps. apt-get update # apt-get install dmidecode flashrom - Unable to locate package dmidecode & flashrom # apt-get install libc6-i386 - Unable to locate package libc6=i386SolvedNetgear Readynas NVX (Buisness)
I just bought the device for 30 euros and have managed to install the latest official firmware (4.2.31) with Root SSH and fixed the TLS issue. Now I am wondering moving onto flashing something more modern, like Alpine Linux x86. I was wondering if this is possible, advisable and what issues might arise. I have ordered a UART TTL to USB adapter and ask if I would need anything else for this. I appreciate all kinds of feedback. Thanks in advancedHas anyone succesfully updated RNONS6(.10.9) the kernel 4.4.218 to above 4.10 and higher?
Hi, question is simple. I am using RNOS 6.10.9 or 6.10.10 (prefer prelast tuned up version). Has anyone been able and succesfully updated LINUX kernel headers itself at least to 4.10 version and above while keeping ReadyNAS OS installed? I've managed to recompile 4.4.218.x86_64.1. kernel (the available latest linux headers) from public netgear GPL source files for ReadyNAS OS6(.10.9) - package (ReadyNASOS_V6.10.9_WW_src.zip) and there it ends. This allowed me to use 2,5gbit usb-rj45 stick and its driver to improve network transfer speed. But to utilize and use full 5gbit or 10gbit network using rj45 and lan network cable, it requires 4.10 as minimum kernel version at least. Three topics reffering to very same inquiry (i mean updating from 4.4.218.x86_64.1.) https://community.netgear.com/discussions/readynas-use/6-6-0-source-for-kernel-compile/1181799 https://www.facebook.com/groups/NetgearReadyNAS/posts/24065097959771682/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/NetgearReadyNAS/posts/9968858536488861/ Below the line.. i have downloaded original Debian Linux 4.10 (whole genuine package), containing even kernel headers of this version (x86), but i was unable to compile it, fully, getting stuck on LILO or GRUB steps, and linux image update problem, i cant solve. (topic regarding 2,5gbit network usb-rj45 adapter usage connected to usb3 port) https://community.netgear.com/discussions/readynas-general/2-5gbe-usb-lan/2455947 ReadyNAS 312 Thank youReadynas Ultra 6
My brother gave me a dead Ultra 6. I was able to get it running with 1 Barracuda XT so far. I upgraded it to 6.9.5 firmware and added ram. It still booted so I assume that it took the ram but I don't know where to look to find out. I tried to install Plex but I get a message "There was a problem saving these settings".If I relaunch it it comes up with the message "An unclaimed media server has been found on your network. Claim it now?" And I am unable to claim it. There is also a message "Version 1.11.3.4803 An update is available. Please install manually." It takes me to Plex and I chose Netgear "v.1.42.2.10156-f737b826c September 18, 2025" Which only has Arm7 and Win64. I tried the Arm 7 and it fails. I believe the Ultra 6 is Arm5. Is there a newer version for the Ultra 6. If I can get plex to work I'll look for drives. So far all the links for drive compatibility are dead. If I can't get plex working I don't think it's worth putting anymore money into it. ThanksSolvedPower outage - RN528X does not auto-power on, causing UPS Slave errors
Early southern California winter storm, lost power for a few hours. Have the following setup: Cyberpower CP1500PFCLCDA 1500VA UPS RN528X is USB-connected to UPS and configured in RN OS 6.10.9 "Power" Settings RN528X Wake on LAN is ENABLED Power outage triggered UPS battery-low condition after 13 minutes, prompting RN528X to shut down: However, after power was restored, RN528X did not power back on. It remained powered down. According to Netgear, an OS 6 device with WoL enabled should auto-power on after a shutdown event: "When wake-on-LAN is enabled, if the unit is disconnected from AC power it will power on when AC power is reconnected." Wondering why this did not happen...? Normally, I would say "who cares"... however in my setup I have 3 other ReadyNAS OS6 boxes configured as "Remote UPS" to the RN528X. They are RN424, RN314, and RN212, all running 6.10.9 and all with WoL enabled. When the RN528X doesn't power back on, the other NAS boxes each begin complaining with this frequent message: Am I doing something wrong by using one NAS as the "Host" for UPS and the others as "Slaves"? I thought this is how it's supposed to be managed using a single UPS.ReadyNAS Pro 6 max RAM
Hi all, Yes, I'm aware the Pro 6 is ancient and I'm aware that many threads here seem to suggest that 8GB is the maximum this box can take. But I'd like to have zfs/TrueNAS on it and I'd love 16GB on it. So I thought I'd ask: is 8GB the actual limit or could it be that it might take 16GB, it's just that nobody ever tried that? It's DDR2 so I'd imagine it might simply be because 8GB DDR2 sticks don't exist? Thanks!