NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
ReadyNAS 2304 - AWS S3 Backup process
Four 10T drives were setup in RAID 10 with 18+T useable. There is 8T worth of Data in the drives. Started the Amazon S3 backup process and it took 5 days to backup 4 T out of the 8T. If I man...
A second NAS would certainly be much faster for recovery, and you could even simply change the backup to the primary for quick user access if you keep the contents in sync. In another building is good, but you still need to evaluate the impact of a major disaster like hurricane, tornado, wildfire, flood, etc. if your region is subject to those, especially if you have any regulatory or contractual backup requirements.
The absolute best, of course, would be to have both. A local backup for quick recovery and cloud for a major disaster. You might be able to be more selective in what goes to the cloud if you have local as well. Basically, if your facility is destroyed in a flood, just how much will you need? You probably won't need it really quickly.
My backup plan is local NAS for everything and remote NAS 3 states away for critical stuff via a VPN.
Sandshark wrote:
The absolute best, of course, would be to have both. A local backup for quick recovery and cloud for a major disaster.
I agree on that. I use a combination of local and cloud myself - though in my case the cloud backup is running on a PC that has the NAS volume mounted as a network drive. Many of the cloud backup solutions don't support that.
You could look into egynte - their solution runs on the NAS. No idea on their solution (or pricing) compares with amazon cloud, but there are folks here who use them.
NETGEAR Academy
Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!
