NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
t1000-forever
Jan 26, 2026Aspirant
Best way to swap drives ReadyNAS nv+ v2
I know that my ReadyNAS nv+ v2 is no longer supported, however I would like to use it as a place to store data that can easily be reproduced. I've had it fitted from day 1 with two 3 TB Western Digital WD30EFRX drives using X-raid2 (effectively using RAID-1 giving me 3 TB of net capacity).
I got hold of four 3 TB Hitachi DK7SAD300 drives; my plan is to install all 4 drives in my ReadyNAS (giving me 9 TB of net capacity in RAID-5).
Here's what I plan to do:
- Create a backup of the existing data on one of the Hitachi DK7SAD300 drives (done).
- Remove existing two Western Digital WD30EFRX drives from my ReadyNAS. Install three of the four Hitachi DK7SAD300 drives in my ReadyNAS; perform a factory reset and install using RaidAR version 4.3.8; my plan is to use X-raid2 again, so will end up with a single volume.
- Copy the data back from the backup created under (1).
- Finally, insert the final Hitachi DK7SAD300drive in the ReadyNAS (destroying the backup on there).
Any suggestions or recommendations? Alternatively, I could create a backup on one of the two Western Digital WD30EFRXdrives (removing one from the ReadyNAS). And configure the ReadyNAS with all four Hitachi DK7SAD300 drives from the start. Only drawback is that I would have to backup my data once more (which will take a couple of days over 1 Gbps ethernet).
And should I use or 4.3.8 of RaidAR software? I also came across 6.5.0.
Finally, should the above plan hit any issues. Can I still put my two Western Digital WD30EFRX drives back in my ReadyNAS?
Thanks!
With the help of StephenB, I disabled write cache in the new three drive setup, also opted to disable AFP, NFS, ReadyDLNA and UPnP services while I was at it.
Low and behold, this time Robocopy was able to copy 35+ GB at 200 Mbps to the NAS without any issues! So I now have Robocopy copying a lot of other data to the NAS, my guess is that whatever the issue was has gone.
16 Replies
- StephenBGuru - Experienced User
t1000-forever wrote:
- Create a backup of the existing data on one of the Hitachi DK7SAD300 drives (done).
- Remove existing two Western Digital WD30EFRX drives from my ReadyNAS. Install three of the four Hitachi DK7SAD300 drives in my ReadyNAS; perform a factory reset and install using RaidAR version 4.3.8; my plan is to use X-raid2 again, so will end up with a single volume.
- Copy the data back from the backup created under (1).
- Finally, insert the final Hitachi DK7SAD300 drive in the ReadyNAS (destroying the backup on there).
That will work, and one advantage is that you can reinsert the WD drives (NAS powered down) if something goes wrong. (With your procedure I suggest powering down the NAS before replacing all the drives).
Though if the drives are healthy, you could also
- hot insert one of the Hitachi drives to slot 3 and wait for the resync to complete
- hot insert a second Hitachi drive to slot 4 and wait for the resync to complete
At that point you will also that a 9 TB volume. You could then save the remaining Hitachi drives until you have a failure.
If you don't think the WD drives are reliable, then a variation is to
- hot-swap one of the Hitachi drives with one of the WD drives, and wait for resync to complete.
- hot-swap again. Note both WD drives also serve as backups, since RAID-1 mirrors both drives.
- hot insert the third drive into slot 3
- hot insert the fourth drive into slot 4.
Although both WD drives serve as backups, they might not be synced with each other (since something might get written to the NAS during step 1). But you can boot with either disk installed (other slots empty), and still have full access to your data.
t1000-forever wrote:
I got hold of four 3 TB Hitachi DK7SAD300 drives;
These are old models. I am wondering if you are paying too much attention to the compatibility list? It hasn't been updated in a very long time and is best ignored.
Seagate Ironwolf, WD Red Plus, and Toshiba N300 are all NAS-purposed drives that will work well in your NAS. Pro models (or enterprise-class drives) will also work well. Avoid desktop class, as they are almost all using SMR technology that isn't well suited to RAID.
If you go forward with the Hitachi drives, then make sure to test them in a PC before using them. I suggest a full non-destructive test, followed by a full write test. Hitachi's disk business was acquired by Western Digital in 2012, so you can try WD's KitFox utility in a Windows PC:
t1000-forever wrote:
And should I use or 4.3.8 of RaidAR software? I also came across 6.5.0.
Either will work with X-RAID. If you were to go with FlexRAID you'd need to use 4.3.8.
- t1000-foreverAspirant
Great thanks for the feedback. Good to know that with my approach, I can always fallback to the WD drives if something goes wrong.
The WD drives have always worked flawlessly (and still do today). My aim though here has been to setup the ReadyNAS from scratch, I have had each of the Hitachi drives in a PC to verify them using CrystalDiskInfo. All reported good health, should I still run some tests using the WD Kitfox tooling?
And no, I did not pay attention to the hardware compatibility list. I figured the Hitachi's will work fine in a NAS, as they're old models they must be CMR (SMR had yet to be invented). Not sure though if they were specifically designed for NAS or Desktops, I got them through someone who was selling 8 of them from his previous NAS though. Let me know your thoughts though.
Ultimately, the Hitachi's will either work or not; if they don't I will simply put the WD drives back in the NAS.
- StephenBGuru - Experienced User
t1000-forever wrote:
should I still run some tests using the WD Kitfox tooling?
Up to you, but I always run both a full non-destructive read test and a full write-zeros test before I put a disk in the NAS.
t1000-forever wrote:
My aim though here has been to setup the ReadyNAS from scratch
Is there a reason you need to do that? Full OS partition, or something similar?
If not, I'd just expand by adding two of the Hitachi disks.
If you do start over, you will need to use a browser that still supports TLS 1.0. For instance, FireFox with the security.tls.version.min set to 1 (browse to about:config and search for the setting).
After it is set up again, you'd want to install the add-on that adds TLS 1.2 support. The add-on link is:
- https://github.com/rdynsxtrs/r5bin/blob/master/apache2/Apache2_2.2.34-arm-0.0.1.bin
- t1000-foreverAspirant
After manually testing the three 3 TB Hitachi DK7SAD300 drives, I installed them in my ReadyNAS nv+ v2. Upon boot, it detected that a new install was required (it indicated an install of firmware followed by a 10 minute wait). Using RaidAR version 4.3.8, it detected the NAS on the network. I chose to set it up using X-RAID-2 with a single volume. Later that day, it performed a sync of the volume to (I think) the third drive successfully.
Next up I started copying data back from my backup using Robocopy over SMB/ethernet. Performance was reasonable at about 250 Mbps, however it stopped copying data after about 25 GB. At that point, the SMB share was no longer accessible somehow and I was no longer able to ping the NAS from anywhere in my network. I was able to gracefully shutdown the NAS using the Power button, after a reboot I was able to resume copying data.
Unfortunately, the same pattern keeps repeating itself. After copying some data, the NAS ceases to be accessible over the network again. See screenshot below to illustrate what's happening.
Any suggestions? Are there some logs I should look at? Could it be that the 3 TB Hitachi DK7SAD300 drives are not working well in this NAS? I never encountered this issue using the 3 TB Western Digital WD30EFRX drives.
Thanks.
- t1000-foreverAspirant
StephenB appreciate your help here.
Any thoughts on why the NAS stops being accessible over the network after copying a (small) amount of data? I feel that this issue should be understood and resolved, otherwise I feel I should put back the original two 3 TB Western Digital WD30EFRX drives.
- StephenBGuru - Experienced User
t1000-forever wrote:
Any thoughts on why the NAS stops being accessible over the network after copying a (small) amount of data?
Download the full log zip file from the dashboard, and take a look in there for clues. If you can't sort it out, you can send me a private message (PM) with a link to the full zip. Make sure the permissions are set so anyone with the link can download. You send a PM using the envelope icon in the upper right of the forum page.
One caveat here - I've never owned this particular model, which does limit my ability to help troubleshoot.
- SandsharkSensei
That's a CMR drive, so should work well. It sounds like you may be overwhelming the OS. Try using a backup job on the NAS instead of robocopy. It may go slower, but not needed to keep re-starting would be preferable, I think.
- t1000-foreverAspirant
Yeah the drives are from an era when SMR had yet to be invented. However, I don't believe it should be possible to overwhelm the OS of the ReadyNAS nv+ v2 using a standard Windows tool like Robocopy that simply relies on SMBv1 to create/write to files on the NAS at about 250 Mbps. Happy to try copying using other tools, not sure how to slow things down though. What I like about Robocopy is that you can preserve the timestamps of files and directories.
Not sure how one would configure a backup job to copy from a Windows PC in the network? Happy to try that of course to see if it makes a difference. The "good" news is that the issue is easily reproduced within 15 minutes or so.
- StephenBGuru - Experienced User
t1000-forever wrote:
What I like about Robocopy is that you can
https://www.smallnetbuilder.com/nas/nas-reviews/netgear-readynas-duo-v2-reviewed/
preserve the timestamps of files and directories.
FWIW, I use Robocopy also.
The name stands for "Robust File Copy". It is designed to handle intermittent connection failures, and still provide accurate copies and mirrored folders. Those robustness features do slow it down, so it is NOT a good tool to measure the NAS performance. A better tool you can use for testing is NAStester
As far as what your NAS is capable of, it was an entry-level NAS, and it is certainly limited by its CPU.
There is an old review of the Duo v2 here:
- https://www.smallnetbuilder.com/nas/nas-reviews/netgear-readynas-duo-v2-reviewed/
That is the two-bay version of your NAS. They measured RAID-1 write performance at about 50 Mbps, and about 87 Mbps RAID-1 read performance.
Related Content
NETGEAR Academy
Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!