NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
Ripperoo
Aug 23, 2013Aspirant
Struggling With Low Speeds < 15MBps Over Gigabit
Hey Guys
I have been having a major PITA regarding transfer speeds ever since I purchased my 'ReadyNas Ultra 4 Plus' in May 2011.
Originally, I was only getting approx 5-6 MB/second and came to the conclusion that it was probably due to using 'Netgear Homeplugs', which apparently didn't support jumbo frames even though they were the 500MBps version .
I also discovered that the integrated Broadcom network adapter within my 'Dell XPS8300' didn't support jumbo frames either, despite that being Gigabit. :shock:
Requiring faster transfer speeds, I ditched the 'Netgear Homeplugs' and invested in an 'Intel Gigabit CT' network adapter as well as a TP-Link TL-SG1005D5 5-port unmanaged Gigabit switch.
This increased the speed to approx 10-12 MB/second and I've put up with that for a while now.
However after recently reading a webpage, 'Bott's Thoughts' dated 2010, I was disappointed to read that I should be expecting around 80 MB/second :shock: .
So I want to try and get to the bottom of this poor network performance once and for all.
Current set up consists of:
'ReadyNas Ultra 4 Plus'
RAIDiator 4.2.23 (v4.2.24 Available)
4 x 2TB SAMSUNG HD204UI - 5400RPM - RAID-5
4GB DDR2 Memory Upgrade
Auto Negotiation @ 1Gbit/Full Duplex
Jumbo Frames/Packets Enabled
IPv6 Disabled
Main PC
'DELL XPS8300'
Intel i7-2600 CPU @ 3.4GHz
Window 7 64-bit
2 x 1TB Western Digital WD10EALX - 7200RPM RAID-0
16GB DDR3
Disabled Onboard Broadcom Gigabit Network Adapter (No Jumbo Frame/Packet Support)
Intel Gigabit CT Network Adapter
Auto Negotiation @ 1Gbit/Full Duplex
Jumbo Frames/Packets Enabled = 9014
IPv6 Disabled
Router/Switch
Billion BiPAC 7800N
Firmware 1.06h
4 x Gigabit Ports
Jumbo Frames Enable by Default (Apparently)
DHCP Server
IPv6 Disabled
Unmanaged Switch
TP-Link - TL-SG1005D
5 x Auto-Negotiation Gigabit Ports
Belkin CAT5e Cables / All Tested
Currently, the ''Dell XPS8300' PC is connected directly to the 'Billion 7800N' router/switch (both upstairs), which is then connected to the unmanaged switch downstairs via CAT5e cable.
The switch is then connected to:
'ReadyNas Ultra 4 Plus'
MEDE8ER Multimedia Streamer
'SKY HD' Receiver
XBOX360 Slim
Samsung BD-C5900 3D Bluray Player
For test purposes:
I copied a 3.2GB file from the 'ReadyNAS' to the 'Dell XPS8300' and the average Windows reported read speed was approx 100MBps
I copied the same file back and the average Windows reported write speed was 11MB/second. :?
Moved the same file from the 'ReadyNAS' to the 'Dell XPS8300' and the average Windows reported read speed was approx 120MBps
Moved the same file back and the average Windows reported write speed was 10MB/second. :shock:
Done the same with a 'HP 8000 Elite USDT', which is also Gigabit and the results were similar.
The results from a utility called 'LAN Speed Test' (3GB test file to the same folder) show the following:
Average Read Speed: 29MB/second
Average Write Speed: 18MB/second
Surely the write speed to the 'ReadyNAS' should be better than 10-12MB/second?
The only thing I haven't tried is a direct cable connection between the 'Dell XPS8300' and the 'ReadyNAS' as I don't have a cable long enough as present.
Going to order a Belkin 20m CAT5e or CAT6 cable now and see if that improves speeds any.
Is there anything obvious I've missed?
Looking at the above, I'm now wondering whether the difference in drive speeds between the 'Dell XPS8300' and the 'ReadyNAS' is causing this.
If so, would the expected transfer rate be affected that much or is it more likely to be an external hardware or even a software/driver problem?
Any ideas welcome.
Oh, and if you got this far without losing the will to live, then well done! You deserve a medal! :D
I have been having a major PITA regarding transfer speeds ever since I purchased my 'ReadyNas Ultra 4 Plus' in May 2011.
Originally, I was only getting approx 5-6 MB/second and came to the conclusion that it was probably due to using 'Netgear Homeplugs', which apparently didn't support jumbo frames even though they were the 500MBps version .
I also discovered that the integrated Broadcom network adapter within my 'Dell XPS8300' didn't support jumbo frames either, despite that being Gigabit. :shock:
Requiring faster transfer speeds, I ditched the 'Netgear Homeplugs' and invested in an 'Intel Gigabit CT' network adapter as well as a TP-Link TL-SG1005D5 5-port unmanaged Gigabit switch.
This increased the speed to approx 10-12 MB/second and I've put up with that for a while now.
However after recently reading a webpage, 'Bott's Thoughts' dated 2010, I was disappointed to read that I should be expecting around 80 MB/second :shock: .
So I want to try and get to the bottom of this poor network performance once and for all.
Current set up consists of:
'ReadyNas Ultra 4 Plus'
RAIDiator 4.2.23 (v4.2.24 Available)
4 x 2TB SAMSUNG HD204UI - 5400RPM - RAID-5
4GB DDR2 Memory Upgrade
Auto Negotiation @ 1Gbit/Full Duplex
Jumbo Frames/Packets Enabled
IPv6 Disabled
Main PC
'DELL XPS8300'
Intel i7-2600 CPU @ 3.4GHz
Window 7 64-bit
2 x 1TB Western Digital WD10EALX - 7200RPM RAID-0
16GB DDR3
Disabled Onboard Broadcom Gigabit Network Adapter (No Jumbo Frame/Packet Support)
Intel Gigabit CT Network Adapter
Auto Negotiation @ 1Gbit/Full Duplex
Jumbo Frames/Packets Enabled = 9014
IPv6 Disabled
Router/Switch
Billion BiPAC 7800N
Firmware 1.06h
4 x Gigabit Ports
Jumbo Frames Enable by Default (Apparently)
DHCP Server
IPv6 Disabled
Unmanaged Switch
TP-Link - TL-SG1005D
5 x Auto-Negotiation Gigabit Ports
Belkin CAT5e Cables / All Tested
Currently, the ''Dell XPS8300' PC is connected directly to the 'Billion 7800N' router/switch (both upstairs), which is then connected to the unmanaged switch downstairs via CAT5e cable.
The switch is then connected to:
'ReadyNas Ultra 4 Plus'
MEDE8ER Multimedia Streamer
'SKY HD' Receiver
XBOX360 Slim
Samsung BD-C5900 3D Bluray Player
For test purposes:
I copied a 3.2GB file from the 'ReadyNAS' to the 'Dell XPS8300' and the average Windows reported read speed was approx 100MBps
I copied the same file back and the average Windows reported write speed was 11MB/second. :?
Moved the same file from the 'ReadyNAS' to the 'Dell XPS8300' and the average Windows reported read speed was approx 120MBps
Moved the same file back and the average Windows reported write speed was 10MB/second. :shock:
Done the same with a 'HP 8000 Elite USDT', which is also Gigabit and the results were similar.
The results from a utility called 'LAN Speed Test' (3GB test file to the same folder) show the following:
Average Read Speed: 29MB/second
Average Write Speed: 18MB/second
Surely the write speed to the 'ReadyNAS' should be better than 10-12MB/second?
The only thing I haven't tried is a direct cable connection between the 'Dell XPS8300' and the 'ReadyNAS' as I don't have a cable long enough as present.
Going to order a Belkin 20m CAT5e or CAT6 cable now and see if that improves speeds any.
Is there anything obvious I've missed?
Looking at the above, I'm now wondering whether the difference in drive speeds between the 'Dell XPS8300' and the 'ReadyNAS' is causing this.
If so, would the expected transfer rate be affected that much or is it more likely to be an external hardware or even a software/driver problem?
Any ideas welcome.
Oh, and if you got this far without losing the will to live, then well done! You deserve a medal! :D
36 Replies
Replies have been turned off for this discussion
- RipperooAspirantWell, I've been a way for a few days, so apologies for no updates.
Using a brand new 15m Belkin STP patch cable (all other devices disconnected), I carried out the Ping tests to the ReadyNAS both direct (with static IP on the PC NIC) and also via the switch (DHCP) the results from the Broadcom NIC were no different to before.
The results were slightly better than last time using the Intel NIC, where the Ping was successful up to a maximum of 1472 as opposed to the previous test carried out using the the 'coupled' cable, where the maximum ping value was 1449 .
Following the above advice, I changed the settings to the following:
Enable disk write cache: Selected/Checked
Disable full data journaling: Selected/Checked
Enable fast USB disk writes: Selected/Checked
Writing was 60-70 MB/sec
I then unselected/unchecked Disable full data journaling and the write speed dropped to:
36 MB/Sec (Jumbo Frames Enabled)
32 MB/Sec (Jumbo Frames Unselected)
So I'm guessing this is about as good as it gets then?
If so, thanks again guys, the advice has been really helpful and hopefully others can squeeze a bit ore out of their ReadyNAS. - StephenBGuru - Experienced User60-70 is what you should be seeing.
- RipperooAspirant
StephenB wrote: 60-70 is what you should be seeing.
Even using drag'n'drop in Windows Explorer and with 'Disable full data journaling' unselected/unchecked on the ReadyNAS?
I did have 60-70 MB/sec, but that is with the above option selected/checked, which is not to be advised as far I understand, unless a UPS is being used.
Did I read that right? - RipperooAspirantNAS Tester Results:
Full Data Journaling - ENABLED
Running a 400MB file WRITE on drive V: 5 times...
Iteration 1: 29.96 MB/sec
Iteration 2: 28.19 MB/sec
Iteration 3: 28.55 MB/sec
Iteration 4: 27.59 MB/sec
Iteration 5: 27.01 MB/sec
------------------------------
Average (WRITE): 28.26 MB/sec
------------------------------
Running a 400MB file READ on drive V: 5 times...
Iteration 1: 112.68 MB/sec
Iteration 2: 108.40 MB/sec
Iteration 3: 109.29 MB/sec
Iteration 4: 114.94 MB/sec
Iteration 5: 114.61 MB/sec
------------------------------
Average (READ): 111.98 MB/sec
------------------------------
Achievement unlocked: 100MB+/sec read speed!
I then changed the 'Disable Full Data Journaling' option to [Checked] and rebooted the ReadyNAS.
Full Data Journaling - DISABLED
Running a 400MB file WRITE on drive V: 5 times...
Iteration 1: 77.86 MB/sec
Iteration 2: 69.94 MB/sec
Iteration 3: 65.04 MB/sec
Iteration 4: 74.91 MB/sec
Iteration 5: 69.81 MB/sec
------------------------------
Average (WRITE): 71.51 MB/sec
------------------------------
Running a 400MB file READ on drive V: 5 times...
Iteration 1: 105.82 MB/sec
Iteration 2: 109.59 MB/sec
Iteration 3: 108.70 MB/sec
Iteration 4: 108.99 MB/sec
Iteration 5: 109.89 MB/sec
------------------------------
Average (READ): 108.60 MB/sec
------------------------------
Achievement unlocked: 100MB+/sec read speed! - RipperooAspirantAnother test done with 'Full Data Journaling' disabled, this time with 'Jumbo Frames' enabled on the ReadyNAS and '4K Jumbo Packets' enabled on the Intel NIC
Full Data Journaling - DISABLED
Running a 400MB file WRITE on drive V: 5 times...
Iteration 1: 68.01 MB/sec
Iteration 2: 99.77 MB/sec
Iteration 3: 87.81 MB/sec
Iteration 4: 92.23 MB/sec
Iteration 5: 97.49 MB/sec
------------------------------
Average (WRITE): 89.06 MB/sec
------------------------------
Running a 400MB file READ on drive V: 5 times...
Iteration 1: 91.25 MB/sec
Iteration 2: 89.65 MB/sec
Iteration 3: 88.42 MB/sec
Iteration 4: 89.03 MB/sec
Iteration 5: 91.25 MB/sec
------------------------------
Average (READ): 89.91 MB/sec
------------------------------
Read speed has took a bit of a hit, but the write speed is up to an average of almost 90 MB/sec.
Another test done with 'Full Data Journaling' disabled, this time with 'Jumbo Frames' enabled on the ReadyNAS and '(9K Jumbo Packets' enabled on the Intel NIC
Full Data Journaling - DISABLED
Running a 400MB file WRITE on drive V: 5 times...
Iteration 1: 86.92 MB/sec
Iteration 2: 88.11 MB/sec
Iteration 3: 88.42 MB/sec
Iteration 4: 80.82 MB/sec
Iteration 5: 83.68 MB/sec
------------------------------
Average (WRITE): 85.59 MB/sec
------------------------------
Running a 400MB file READ on drive V: 5 times...
Iteration 1: 72.99 MB/sec
Iteration 2: 67.91 MB/sec
Iteration 3: 72.99 MB/sec
Iteration 4: 69.94 MB/sec
Iteration 5: 69.57 MB/sec
------------------------------
Average (READ): 70.68 MB/sec
------------------------------
This seems to be the worst out of the two 'Jumbo Packet' options available on the Intel NIC. - StephenBGuru - Experienced UserWell we know your network doesn't carry jumbo frames, so it isn't surprising that the speeds slow down when you use them.
-I suggest that you purchase a UPS for the NAS. They protect against power surges, and ensure clean shutdowns when the power fails.
-Personally I would leave jumbo frames off.
Related Content
NETGEAR Academy

Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!