NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
Solved
WAX610-100JPS VLAN設定(Untagged/Tagged)について / VLAN Untagged/Tagged setting on wired port
Japanese --- お世話になっております。 弊社にてNETGEAR WAX610-100JPSの導入を検討しており、ユーザーズマニュアル記載の仕様について1点確認させてください。 構成イメージは以下の通りです。 ・WAX610をブリッジモード(NATモード無効、初期設定のまま)で使用 ・SSID1にVLAN ID 1(初期値)を割り当て ・SSID2に別のV...
The intended configuration is as follows:
WAX610 used in Bridge mode (NAT mode disabled, default settings)
- SSID1 assigned VLAN ID 1 (default)
- SSID2 assigned a different VLAN ID (e.g., VLAN 20)
- Connected to an upstream router via a single LAN cable, with the upstream router separating segments per VLANDefinitively possible, yes.
Regarding the "Untagged VLAN" checkbox described on pages 151-152 of the User Manual, I understand this to be a single setting that applies to the entire wired (Ethernet) interface. If this setting is left as "Untagged VLAN" (default, VLAN ID 1), which of the following behaviors occurs?
(A) Frames belonging to the SSID on the native VLAN (VLAN 1 in this case) are sent untagged, while frames from SSIDs assigned other VLAN IDs (e.g., VLAN 20) are automatically tagged and sent out simultaneously from the same wired port (i.e., behavior similar to an 802.1Q trunk port).Correct: Confirmed, your understanding is correct!
Native VLAN is an outated Cisco (plus some other vendor) designation from the past, modern switches no longer have such a potentially cumbersome default native VLAN anymore.
You have to configure an Access Port for [U]ntagged VLAN 1, and don't forget to set the port to PVID 1, so untagged ingress frames will be assigned to the switch VLAN ID 1.
If behavior (A) is confirmed, we believe it would be possible to pass traffic from both SSID1 (VLAN1) and SSID2 (VLAN20) to the upstream router over a single LAN cable, with access control per VLAN handled on the upstream router side.
Exactly, thats the way it is.
The intended configuration is as follows:
WAX610 used in Bridge mode (NAT mode disabled, default settings)
- SSID1 assigned VLAN ID 1 (default)
- SSID2 assigned a different VLAN ID (e.g., VLAN 20)
- Connected to an upstream router via a single LAN cable, with the upstream router separating segments per VLAN
Definitively possible, yes.
Regarding the "Untagged VLAN" checkbox described on pages 151-152 of the User Manual, I understand this to be a single setting that applies to the entire wired (Ethernet) interface. If this setting is left as "Untagged VLAN" (default, VLAN ID 1), which of the following behaviors occurs?
(A) Frames belonging to the SSID on the native VLAN (VLAN 1 in this case) are sent untagged, while frames from SSIDs assigned other VLAN IDs (e.g., VLAN 20) are automatically tagged and sent out simultaneously from the same wired port (i.e., behavior similar to an 802.1Q trunk port).
Correct: Confirmed, your understanding is correct!
Native VLAN is an outated Cisco (plus some other vendor) designation from the past, modern switches no longer have such a potentially cumbersome default native VLAN anymore.
You have to configure an Access Port for [U]ntagged VLAN 1, and don't forget to set the port to PVID 1, so untagged ingress frames will be assigned to the switch VLAN ID 1.
If behavior (A) is confirmed, we believe it would be possible to pass traffic from both SSID1 (VLAN1) and SSID2 (VLAN20) to the upstream router over a single LAN cable, with access control per VLAN handled on the upstream router side.
Exactly, thats the way it is.
NETGEAR Academy
Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!
