NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
Bashful
Feb 13, 2012Aspirant
ReadyNAS Duo and odd drives
In a ReadyNAS Duo, do the two drives have to be identical? (I want to run with mirrored drives)
I currently have one of these:
Seagate 2TB Barracuda LP 3.5" Hard Drive - SATAII 5900rpm 32MB Cache
which was on the compatibilty list. Seagate have now updated it to this:
ST2000DL003 Barracuda Green 3.5-inch 2TB SATA 6 Gb/s Drive (64MB Buffer,5900RPM)
and I see that Netgeer have updated their compatibility list to include this.
Can I run my ReadyNAS Duo with one of the former and one of the latter?
Thanks. :)
I currently have one of these:
Seagate 2TB Barracuda LP 3.5" Hard Drive - SATAII 5900rpm 32MB Cache
which was on the compatibilty list. Seagate have now updated it to this:
ST2000DL003 Barracuda Green 3.5-inch 2TB SATA 6 Gb/s Drive (64MB Buffer,5900RPM)
and I see that Netgeer have updated their compatibility list to include this.
Can I run my ReadyNAS Duo with one of the former and one of the latter?
Thanks. :)
5 Replies
- PapaBear1ApprenticeThe only problem you may run into is if one of the drive has slightly less space on the drive. If you establish the array with the larger one and attempt to add the smaller, it will be rejected. You will get a message in Frontview (the message will be logged) that the drive you are attempting to add is too small. It only takes one less sector and unless you do extensive testing, you won't know which one it is. It can even happen with two drives of the identical model. I have 10 ST31000528AS drives that were acquired some 18 months ago (8 in original service and 2 spares). While the service has changed, I had two of the drives in my old NV+, and recently got a message that a drive had failed in the array. The first two spares I installed were rejected as too small. I then had to open a refurbished drive received in replacement of a failed drive. It was accepted.
It is always recommended that you backup your data in the situation of replacing a drive. When the resync process takes place the drives run actively for a period of hours and the stress can cause the failure of a second drive if it is weak. Even in an array of three or more drives, if in a single redundant situation the data could be lost. In the case of a two drive array it most certainly would. Besides, maintaining a current and complete backup is always a good idea, as it is never a good idea to trust your critical and important data to only one device, be it a single drive or a single multi-drive device. - BashfulAspirantUseful info, thanks. :)
When you say that a drive might have less space I am assuming you mean due to bad sectors? Because I would assume that all 2TB drives running the same format would otherwise have the same number of sectors, even those from different manufacturers. - PapaBear1ApprenticeOne would assume so, but, I have twice had brand new drives have the same problems. The first time was with two Samsung 500GB drives I attempted to add to exapand a volume of 2x500GB Seagate drives. The NV+ accepted the first and rejected the second as being too small. The second time was with the two 1TB Seagates of the same model. Since I did not format the drives with a desktop, I do not know if there were bad sectors, but one would think so.
It does seem odd, since the drives all are supposed to have many spare sectors to reallocate. So a small number of bad sectors should not impact the capacity.PapaBear wrote: One would assume so, but, I have twice had brand new drives have the same problems. The first time was with two Samsung 500GB drives I attempted to add to exapand a volume of 2x500GB Seagate drives. The NV+ accepted the first and rejected the second as being too small. The second time was with the two 1TB Seagates of the same model. Since I did not format the drives with a desktop, I do not know if there were bad sectors, but one would think so. - PapaBear1ApprenticeI know. When it first happened on the Samsung drives, I blamed it on the fact that the drive had been formatted on NTSF even though all partitions had been removed. In the case of the Seagate 1TB drives, they had been previously used in my NV+, partitions deleted and then hot added to the NVX to replace a drive that had failed.
Related Content
NETGEAR Academy

Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!