NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
x0m0
Feb 20, 2014Aspirant
RN716X performance
Hello all We're looking at at the ReadyNAS 716x, and read the Anandtech review linked to on the readynas.com resources tab: http://www.netgear.com/business/products/storage/readynas/readynas-deskt...
x0m0
Feb 20, 2014Aspirant
Wow. I skimmed the article originally and assumed that the client was also connected to the 10Gb-T switch. But it's not. The client is connected with multiple link-bonded 1 Gb-T connections to switch A, which connects via 10 GB/s SFP+ to switch B, which then connects via 10Gb-T to ReadyNAS RN716X.
@ahpsi - Interesting. There should be many IO 'operations' for each iSCSI test, so I had hoped that multiple 1 Gb/s operations could be in-flight, yielding higher aggregate performance. But I don't know enough about the link bonding hash mode. Perhaps the RR or L3 modes would be better for single-client tests.
In any event, I hope Netgear publishes some performance numbers for 10GbE Client <--> 10GbE RN716X test setups, or at least solicits someone to publish a review of such a test setup.
@ahpsi - Interesting. There should be many IO 'operations' for each iSCSI test, so I had hoped that multiple 1 Gb/s operations could be in-flight, yielding higher aggregate performance. But I don't know enough about the link bonding hash mode. Perhaps the RR or L3 modes would be better for single-client tests.
In any event, I hope Netgear publishes some performance numbers for 10GbE Client <--> 10GbE RN716X test setups, or at least solicits someone to publish a review of such a test setup.
Related Content
NETGEAR Academy
Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!