- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
Re: Connection strength vs reliability
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Is the penalty for weakened reception between a device and router/ satellite only throughput or is reliability affected as well?
For example, via Genie app on my computer I can see that some devices have 100% signal strength and are showing throughput 400 Mbps. Great. Other devices further away and behind a wall or two are showing signal strength 40% and throughput 150 Mbps. Hence lies the question: is lower signal strength impact only throughput or is reliability/ stability also affected?
Thank you,
Orbi man.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The penalty to reduced signal strength is throughput only. However, operating at long distances and/or very low signal strength you might see reliability issues, due to the time-variability of radio signals and noise.
The theoretical maximum capacity, C, in bits-per-second of a communications link is determined by the bandwidth, the signal strength, and the noise by the following equation:
C = B * Log2(1 + S/N)
where B is the channel bandwidth, S is the signal strength, and N is the noise strength. S/N is also called the signal-to-noise ratio.
Bandwidth is fixed at either 20 MHZ or 40 MHZ by the WiFi standard. So, if the signal strength drops, or the noise goes up, then the throughput must drop to compensate or there will be errors on the channel.
The WiFi hardware tries to adjust the link speed to stay under the channel capacity, C, as determined by the currently available SNR. That's why your devices further away show a lower throughput.
If you operate under the channel capacity, the link should be reliable. However, with wireless connections, both S and N will vary randomly over time. Noise sources come and go, people or objects block the signal, etc. At long distances and low SNRs the hardware may not be able to adjust link speed quickly enough to adapt to the varying SNR, and you might see reliability problems. In most cases, if errors occur the hardware will detect the errors and retransmit the data, but this retransmission lowers the effective throughput.
Your devices will also have lower power radios and less effective antennas than the Orbi, so the device will be the limiting factor. At long distances, your devices may be able to see the Orbi but not be able to link back to it.
All Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Connection strength vs reliability
Not a single response, not even from Netgear mods?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Connection strength vs reliability
You did mentino you don't want comments from anybody unless they "know". I'm sure lots of people could speculate, but the question isn't one a moderator would know any better than anybody else (i.e. the question has nothing to do with Netgear equipement). Really what you are looking for is somekind of wireless engineer/researcher or something like that.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The penalty to reduced signal strength is throughput only. However, operating at long distances and/or very low signal strength you might see reliability issues, due to the time-variability of radio signals and noise.
The theoretical maximum capacity, C, in bits-per-second of a communications link is determined by the bandwidth, the signal strength, and the noise by the following equation:
C = B * Log2(1 + S/N)
where B is the channel bandwidth, S is the signal strength, and N is the noise strength. S/N is also called the signal-to-noise ratio.
Bandwidth is fixed at either 20 MHZ or 40 MHZ by the WiFi standard. So, if the signal strength drops, or the noise goes up, then the throughput must drop to compensate or there will be errors on the channel.
The WiFi hardware tries to adjust the link speed to stay under the channel capacity, C, as determined by the currently available SNR. That's why your devices further away show a lower throughput.
If you operate under the channel capacity, the link should be reliable. However, with wireless connections, both S and N will vary randomly over time. Noise sources come and go, people or objects block the signal, etc. At long distances and low SNRs the hardware may not be able to adjust link speed quickly enough to adapt to the varying SNR, and you might see reliability problems. In most cases, if errors occur the hardware will detect the errors and retransmit the data, but this retransmission lowers the effective throughput.
Your devices will also have lower power radios and less effective antennas than the Orbi, so the device will be the limiting factor. At long distances, your devices may be able to see the Orbi but not be able to link back to it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Connection strength vs reliability
Brilliant, thank you! Exactly the type of answer I was looking for.
• What is the difference between WiFi 6 and WiFi 7?
• Yes! WiFi 7 is backwards compatible with other Wifi devices? Learn more