NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
GAPP
Dec 06, 2012Aspirant
ReadyNAS Ultra 2 as Media Server
Hello,
I have to admit, that I'm not really a veteran on these matters, but I want to learn.
The idea is to have a NAS that I can use as media server. It needs to be fast enough to not cause problems for streaming BluRay material with bitrates in the higher end, and I want storage space for like 6TB minimum. Oh yeah, and I would like the noise to be very low.
I'm planning to order a ReadyNAS Ultra 2, as I was told that this would suit my needs best, but what do I do regarding the HDD's. I searched a bit on the 3TB HDD's that NETGEAR listed as "Hardware Compatibility list", and I'm honestly not sure which ones to pick as I don't know the difference between them, and how well they would work.
I've listed the ones which are available to me underneath, alongside I put in some relevant information, like how big it is, what type and ofcourse - the price:
Hitachi Ultrastar 7K3000 HUA723030ALA640.....3TB, SATA-600. Price $370
Seagate Constellation ST33000650NS.............3TB, SATA-600. Price $360
Western Digital Caviar Green WD30EZRS........3TB, SATA-300. Price $205
Western Digital WD RED WD30EFRX..............3TB, SATA-300. Price $200
Seagate Barracuda XT ST33000651AS............3TB, SATA-600. Price $345
So I see that there is quite a bit of difference in the price, even though the numbers look alike to me. I also see that some of them are SATA-600, while others are SATA-300. Also, would they work best being the same kind?
Any shed of light on these matters is greatly appriciated,
GAPP
I have to admit, that I'm not really a veteran on these matters, but I want to learn.
The idea is to have a NAS that I can use as media server. It needs to be fast enough to not cause problems for streaming BluRay material with bitrates in the higher end, and I want storage space for like 6TB minimum. Oh yeah, and I would like the noise to be very low.
I'm planning to order a ReadyNAS Ultra 2, as I was told that this would suit my needs best, but what do I do regarding the HDD's. I searched a bit on the 3TB HDD's that NETGEAR listed as "Hardware Compatibility list", and I'm honestly not sure which ones to pick as I don't know the difference between them, and how well they would work.
I've listed the ones which are available to me underneath, alongside I put in some relevant information, like how big it is, what type and ofcourse - the price:
Hitachi Ultrastar 7K3000 HUA723030ALA640.....3TB, SATA-600. Price $370
Seagate Constellation ST33000650NS.............3TB, SATA-600. Price $360
Western Digital Caviar Green WD30EZRS........3TB, SATA-300. Price $205
Western Digital WD RED WD30EFRX..............3TB, SATA-300. Price $200
Seagate Barracuda XT ST33000651AS............3TB, SATA-600. Price $345
So I see that there is quite a bit of difference in the price, even though the numbers look alike to me. I also see that some of them are SATA-600, while others are SATA-300. Also, would they work best being the same kind?
Any shed of light on these matters is greatly appriciated,
GAPP
23 Replies
Replies have been turned off for this discussion
- gibxxiGuideXBMC is infinately more configurable than Plex. Plex is a Media Centre software which will be easier to maintain if the WAF (Wife Approval Factor) is an important consideration, or you want something that requires a minimal amount of tinkering or configuration, and you don't desire advanced functionality or add-ons.
XBMC is a better solution if you want advanced features, and don't mind tinkering to get a desirable end result. XBMC also differs from Plex in that each client is a standalone entity (unless your using MySQL Db sharing), whereas Plex uses a central, headless, server application to which each client connects.
Powerline feasibility depends largely on the structure and age of the wiring in your home. If you have old wiring and/or seperate ring-mains, it may be a less attractive option than Wireless. My place is a relatively new build, with a single ring-main, and Wireless performance for me was borderline because of interference. Each system (Wireless vs. Powerline) depends on your individual needs, circumstances, and surroundings. - GAPPAspirantI live in Denmark, and if I choose to import things from the US, I will have to pay duties of those goods, yes.
The house I'm moving into, is not built yet. It's done in August next year, so all the wiring etc will be very new, which I assume will work in my favor if I were to choose Powerline. I'm only renting it, so I don't have the choice to ask them to wire it with cat5 cables aswell, even though that would be preferable.
I'm e abit of a newbie regarding Media Center software, so could you please specify to me what kind of features we're talking about. I've read on some forums that XBMC is better, but Plex is way easier to setup. For example, I'm testing the Plex on my wireless atm. The server on my PC, and my laptop uses the client. I have to admit, it works really well with even Bluray movies with bitrates on 25k+ running though. I'm not totally sure if I'm doing everything correctly as I looked at the server confirgurations last night, and it seems like the max output is capped at 2MB - 768p. Not totally sure how its working though. :) - gibxxiGuideI don't know all that much about the features Plex is capable of because I only gave it minor testing (after having already been using XBMC for over a year). Suffice to say, I wasn't impressed enough in it's features or performance to want to switch.
;)
To list all XBMC's features here, would take too long, and not really answer whether it's the right Media Centre software for YOU. Best thing I can do here, is direct you to their wiki and allow you to draw your own conclusions...
http://wiki.xbmc.org/
P.S: The FAQ section might be a good place to start.
Related Content
NETGEAR Academy
Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!