NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.

Forum Discussion

dsnpevl's avatar
dsnpevl
Virtuoso
Jan 25, 2019
Solved

Invalid unit "P" for Dutch (NL) version of 6.9.5 for the network througput graph

In ReadyNAS OS 6.9.5, the unit for the network througput graph in the Performance tab seems incorrect in the Dutch (NL) language version. There is "P", when there should be "k". It seems correct in the English version. Can this be fixed?

 

 

  • dsnpevl's avatar
    dsnpevl
    Jan 26, 2019

    Retired_Member wrote:

    Hidsnpevl , I upgraded my RN426 yesterday to 6.9.5 and switched the language to Dutch. The units seem to be correct as you can see from the screenshot.

    Kind regards


    Retired_Member, not seeing your image in the forum. Looked at the the graph again today. Seems the problem only occurs if I set the period pulldown to include the period before upgrading. So, e.g. 1 week, 1 month. If I set it to 1 day or shorter, the "k" shows up, as expected.

     

     

    Thinking about the "P" unit, it could be a indicator for Petabyte (https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veelvouden_van_bytes), since I also see "T" being used sometimes that could be used as the unit for Terabyte.  But I seriously doubt my network could ever achieve suchs speeds. I now think that the measurement gap during the upgrade is causing some false data that results in extremely high values in the data througput calculations. Not a big problem, because I seldom look at periods longer than a day.

3 Replies

Replies have been turned off for this discussion
  • Retired_Member's avatar
    Retired_Member

    Hidsnpevl , I upgraded my RN426 yesterday to 6.9.5 and switched the language to Dutch. The units seem to be correct as you can see from the screenshot.

    Kind regards

    • dsnpevl's avatar
      dsnpevl
      Virtuoso

      Retired_Member wrote:

      Hidsnpevl , I upgraded my RN426 yesterday to 6.9.5 and switched the language to Dutch. The units seem to be correct as you can see from the screenshot.

      Kind regards


      Retired_Member, not seeing your image in the forum. Looked at the the graph again today. Seems the problem only occurs if I set the period pulldown to include the period before upgrading. So, e.g. 1 week, 1 month. If I set it to 1 day or shorter, the "k" shows up, as expected.

       

       

      Thinking about the "P" unit, it could be a indicator for Petabyte (https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veelvouden_van_bytes), since I also see "T" being used sometimes that could be used as the unit for Terabyte.  But I seriously doubt my network could ever achieve suchs speeds. I now think that the measurement gap during the upgrade is causing some false data that results in extremely high values in the data througput calculations. Not a big problem, because I seldom look at periods longer than a day.

      • Retired_Member's avatar
        Retired_Member

        dsnpevl wrote: "Thinking about the "P" unit, it could be a indicator for Petabyte"

         

        rofl, that is a good one!

        Great to hear, that you can live with it. I think we now already have the attention of our Netgear mods and this little glitch might be fixed in the next release.

        Kind regards

NETGEAR Academy

Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology! 

Join Us!

ProSupport for Business

Comprehensive support plans for maximum network uptime and business peace of mind.

 

Learn More