NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
M4300
12 TopicsAdd support for M4300 series to NMS300
Hi, it would be nice to manage the M4300 series in NMS300, so please add support to backup the switches config via Telnet (or HTTP/S). See also this post as it shows some errors while using NMS300 to backup config from a M4300 switch: https://community.netgear.com/t5/Managed-Switches/NMS300-switch-config-backup-M4300/m-p/1090642 Thanks and best regards.14KViews0likes1CommentNetgear M4300-28G-PoE+ & Dante/AMX
Hallo zusammen, wir haben 3 M4300-28G-PoE+ im Einsatz, die mit 10G Kupfer bzw. 10G Glas untereinander verbunden sind. Soweit funktionieren die Switche auch Netze, VLAN's, Multicast usw. alles gut. Aber leider haben wir ein Problem mit Dante/AMX. So lange die Dante/AMX Geräte auf einen Switch hängen sehen sich alle Geräte im Dante/AMX Controller. Sobald man die Geräte auf mehreren Switchen verteilt, sieht z.B. der Dante Controller die Geräte nicht mehr. Alle Geräte sind jedoch pingbar und erreichbar. Weiß jemand, woran das liegen könnte? Ich weiß, dass dies nicht zwingend eine Netgear Frage ist, aber vielleicht kennt sich hier jemand mit Dante usw. aus. Laut Dante wird keine spezielle Konfiguration benötigt... Viele Grüße Thomas4.8KViews0likes6CommentsAptoVision®, Aquantia®, Christie Digital®, NETGEAR, Sony® and ZeeVee® launch SDVoE Alliance!
On Thursday Jan. 12, 2017, new Software-Defined Video over Ethernet Alliance (SDVoE) is announced with AptoVision, Aquantia, Christie Digital, NETGEAR, Sony and ZeeVee Founding Members. The SDVoE Alliance will standardize the adoption of Ethernet to transport AV signals in professional AV environments and create an ecosystem around SDVoE technology that allows software to define AV applications. Professional AV environments will be able to transition from circuit-based HDBASE-T matrix switchers to packet-based (multicast) 10G Ethernet switches for transporting Audio-Video signals in healthcare, entertainment, hospitality, retail, etc.. The Alliance will debut at Integrated Systems Europe 2017 (ISE) in Amsterdam Netherlands, February 7-10. NETGEAR offers the widest range of cost-effective 10Gbps switches from web and smart-managed 8-port devices to fully managed 48-port solutions with an ever increasing portfolio. By supporting the SDVoE standard, this is definitely our intent to make video distribution more efficient and flexible for the professional AV market! Regards,3.3KViews0likes0CommentsM4300 (GSM4352PS V1) : can't get kernel image
Hi Netgear Users and Administrators, I have a little problem with my M4300 GSM4352PS V1. There's possibility that image2 is broken. Device is actually booting from image2. On the console I see that can't boot from image and i see "ERROR: can't get kernel image". I supose that the image1 is a good conditional. Best Redgards Pawel2.7KViews0likes1CommentGlobal L2 Loop Protection question on M4300-52G-PoE+
I was testing the L2 Loop Protection capability of my M4300-52G-PoE+ stack by connecting ports 4/0/1 and 4/0/5 together, and the protection seemed to work great, putting port 4/0/1 in a D-Disable state. My question is, after correcting such a state by disconnecting the loop, how do I go about taking the port out of a D-Disable state and putting it back into an Enable state? I see no option to reenable the port via the browser GUI under Switching -> L2 Loop Protection and I'd like to know if the only way to renable the port is to completely reboot the entire stack? Thanks, TedWSolved7.8KViews0likes2CommentsDual DHCP helper-address in startup-config
I'm replacing my M5300 stack with a new M4300 stack and I had a question about a routing command in each of the VLANs on my old M5300 stack. My M5300 was configured by Netgear contracted support when we first purchased it, and as I scroll through the startup-config file from the M5300 I see a few commands for each of the VLANs that I have questions about: Question 1: In the "interface vlan" commands listed in the M5300's startup-config (see example below) I see the command ip helper-address 10.1.0.20 dhcp and I was wondering how I add this option via the browser interface on my new M4300 stack, or can it only be done by modifying and uploading a new startup-config to my M4300 stack? interface vlan 2 routing ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.1.0.20 dhcp exit interface vlan 3 routing ip address 10.1.2.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.1.0.20 dhcp exit interface vlan 4 routing ip address 10.1.11.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.1.0.20 dhcp exit Question 2: I also noticed that the M5300 stack's startup-config had individual interfaces that were configured to include and exclude (see below). Every interface that was untagged for the default VLAN 1 did not have these "include" and "exclude" statements, but All of the ports configured for untagged VLAN 3 and VLAN 4 did. Can someone clue me in on what these commands might be for, and if they can also be added through the browser interface on my new M4300 stack? Computers on VLAN 3 and VLAN 4 can still access servers on VLAN 1, so I'm not sure what the vlan participation exclude 1 is doing. interface 1/0/19 voice vlan 2 auto-voip protocol-based auto-voip oui-based vlan pvid 3 vlan participation exclude 1 vlan participation include 3 exit interface 3/0/47 voice vlan 2 auto-voip protocol-based auto-voip oui-based vlan pvid 4 vlan participation exclude 1 vlan participation include 4 exit Any help with my above questions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, TedWSolved6KViews0likes3CommentsM4300-28G-POE+: LAG + Port Mirroring results in high number of Transmit Packet Discards
Hello, I have an issue with a M4300-28G-POE+ model. The setup I have is quite simple: * 2x1 Gbit links are used which are batched into a LAG * The LAG is mirrored to a probe port. * Jumbo packets are configured. When I generate network traffic on the two links, the 10Gbit uplink receives each of the packets of the LAG of course, but when I am listening on the probe port, ~40% of the packets are dropped. In the Detailed Port Statistics I can see the following: Total Packets Transmitted Successfully: 161364755 Transmit Packets Discarded: 73094691 This example was taken from a scenario when the overall network traffic on the LAG was ~170Mbit/s and on the probe port I measured ~100Mbit/s I've tried to change the configuration based on hints in the Netgear Community threads (like this, since the observation is quite similar: https://community.netgear.com/t5/Smart-Plus-Click-Switches/GS724T-High-number-of-Transmit-Packet-Errors/m-p/393029#M257). When I am not using Jumbo packets but LAG, I observe the same issue. I've updated the firmware to 12.0.2.15 but the issue still occurs on my test environment. Are there any suggestions how to deal with this problem? Best, I.5.7KViews0likes5CommentsTransceiver sonnet SFP+ SR compatible M4300
Hi, i want to know if this SFP+ Short-Range transceiver: Sonnet G10E-SFP-SR https://www.sonnetstore.com/collections/network-adapters/products/sfpmodule-shortrange is compatible with the Switch: Netgear M4300-12x12F I would like to connect the sfp+ transceiver directly in 10GBase-X SFP+ ports of netgear switch replacing AXM761 Does anyone knows if it is compatible and reliable? some other better module? thank u! regards to community7.9KViews0likes5CommentsM4300-24X24F VLAN's, ACL and separation
Good day all, I have found an article, but as soon as I try to set the rules according to the article I lose all connection to the switch and need to undo the ACL using the console cable... https://kb.netgear.com/30818/How-to-configure-routing-VLANs-on-a-NETGEAR-managed-switch-with-shared-internet-access I have a stack of 2x M4300-24X24F, which contains several VLAN's: 1, 20, 90, 91 and 101 Now all theses VLAN,s should not be able to route to eachother, except for VLAN 20 to a few hosts in VLAN 1, and theses few hosts in VLAN 1 to all of VLAN 20. So what is the best way to configure this? Or did I really make a big mistake and should I have gone for HP instead?? (At least on our old HP switch routing is opt-IN instead of opt-OUT?) Sorry to say, but even budget TP-LINK has a more intuitive interface...7.2KViews0likes8Comments