- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark as New
- Mark as Read
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Report Inappropriate Content
Alternative Aspect Ratio Canvas Frames (3:2 or 4:3)
I was so excited to discover the Canvas frames, and as a family of photographers and artists, we would love to fill our home and offices with them. However, the aspect ratio of 16:9 is just a no go.
Professional film cameras and digital camera sensors tend to have 3:2 aspect ratios (sometimes 4:3). While 16:9 is a common screen ratio for computers, TVs, and phones, most professional photographers shoot in 3:2 or something close to it, even if they're going to crop to something like 16:9.
I have decades of photos I'd love to display on the Canvas, both from traditional film and from my 3:2 format digital cameras. But I didn't shoot for 16:9. Cropping them that way ruins the artistic intent of my composition at best, and is impossible at worst.
Further, how many painters have regularly painted on anything that approximates 16:9? Just scanning through the gallery of art available with a Canvas Premium membership reveals the violence that needs to be done to them to crop them at 16:9. It's painful to look at.
I realize that there is most likely a cost consideration in this decision. 16:9 panels are mass produced and therefore probably cheaper. But if you want to attract photographers and artists, I think you need a 3:2 aspect panel. Even 4:3, which was a common panel size before 16:9 become the standard, and may be more affordable, would be a vast improvement.
I'll be the first one in line to buy multiple 3:2 (or even 4:3) aspect Canvas frames!
Thanks so much for considering this request.
*For those interested, here's a helpful video on aspect ratio: https://youtu.be/wQ0m75bGGGg?t=79
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.