Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
Re: Post your performance results
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2009-08-28
08:32 AM
2009-08-28
08:32 AM
Re: Post your performance results
I am getting:
Write 6.2 MBps
Read 4.1 MBps
I have a pretty good feeling that I am going to return it.
Write 6.2 MBps
Read 4.1 MBps
I have a pretty good feeling that I am going to return it.
Message 176 of 309
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2009-08-28
06:13 PM
2009-08-28
06:13 PM
Re: Post your performance results
Copernicus wrote:
Is this a Windows 7 issues or what?
It seems like it here, but can't test, didn't install win xp on this pc yet.
Message 177 of 309
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2009-08-30
04:48 PM
2009-08-30
04:48 PM
Re: Post your performance results
Since IOmeter doesn't work on mac, my xbench scores are below. The volume is mounted via AFP and the NAS has 512mb ram. Using a gigabit switch with jumbo frames:
Results 27.21
System Info
Xbench Version 1.3
System Version 10.5.8 (9L30)
Physical RAM 4096 MB
Model Macmini3,1
Disk Test 27.21
Sequential 16.40
Uncached Write 7.03 4.31 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Write 27.10 15.34 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Uncached Read 18.58 5.44 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Read 91.73 46.10 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Random 79.86
Uncached Write 42.93 4.54 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Write 47.13 15.09 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Uncached Read 619.35 4.39 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Read 252.37 46.83 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Results 27.21
System Info
Xbench Version 1.3
System Version 10.5.8 (9L30)
Physical RAM 4096 MB
Model Macmini3,1
Disk Test 27.21
Sequential 16.40
Uncached Write 7.03 4.31 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Write 27.10 15.34 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Uncached Read 18.58 5.44 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Read 91.73 46.10 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Random 79.86
Uncached Write 42.93 4.54 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Write 47.13 15.09 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Uncached Read 619.35 4.39 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Read 252.37 46.83 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Message 178 of 309
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2009-09-04
03:56 PM
2009-09-04
03:56 PM
Re: Post your performance results
Copying 750 MB file over AFP from 2009 Mac Pro to ReadyNAS Pro Business:
With my Macintosh G5, the fastest I could push data to my NAS was about 57 megabytes/second -- which I was pretty pleased about. I just copied a 750 MB file to my NAS, and my Mac Pro topped out at 94 megabytes/second. That's 750 Mbps.
Drag-copied 5.16 GB file over AFP from Mac Pro to ReadyNAS in 53.39 seconds. Activity Monitor topped out at 104.4 MB/sec.
NetGear GS108 switch. Gig-E, no Jumbo frames, MTU 1500. Hardly any performance tweaking on the ReadyNAS Pro except: adding a UPS to turn off journaling, enabled disk write cache, optimize for OSX. RAIDiator 4.2.5, XRAID-2, 3 GB of RAM (4-5-5-15 DDR2). Using only a single Gig-E interface on the ReadyNAS (no teaming). 2009 Mac Pro, 8 GB of RAM, Snow Leopard. Seagate 7200.12 hard drive.
I did a fresh install of Snow Leopard (not an upgrade of Leopard) onto the Mac Pro.
My OCZ Vertex SSD should arrive soon; I'll re-test network speed then.
With my Macintosh G5, the fastest I could push data to my NAS was about 57 megabytes/second -- which I was pretty pleased about. I just copied a 750 MB file to my NAS, and my Mac Pro topped out at 94 megabytes/second. That's 750 Mbps.
Drag-copied 5.16 GB file over AFP from Mac Pro to ReadyNAS in 53.39 seconds. Activity Monitor topped out at 104.4 MB/sec.
NetGear GS108 switch. Gig-E, no Jumbo frames, MTU 1500. Hardly any performance tweaking on the ReadyNAS Pro except: adding a UPS to turn off journaling, enabled disk write cache, optimize for OSX. RAIDiator 4.2.5, XRAID-2, 3 GB of RAM (4-5-5-15 DDR2). Using only a single Gig-E interface on the ReadyNAS (no teaming). 2009 Mac Pro, 8 GB of RAM, Snow Leopard. Seagate 7200.12 hard drive.
I did a fresh install of Snow Leopard (not an upgrade of Leopard) onto the Mac Pro.
My OCZ Vertex SSD should arrive soon; I'll re-test network speed then.
Message 179 of 309
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2009-09-20
12:09 PM
2009-09-20
12:09 PM
Re: Post your performance results
Since I now have three generations of ReadyNAS, I thought I would post my test results. One key point is that for this system I found that disabling Jumbo Framing on all of the devices, gave the best results. I also found that setting the PC's NIC to maximize network throughput vs. CPU utilization made a significant improvement in overall performance. The cost of this operation resulted in CPU utilization increasing from 10% to 30-44% during testing.
--------------------------------------------------
NAS0:
ReadyNAS X6
RAIDiator 4.1.6 [1.00a147]
512 MB [2.0-2-2-6]
X-RAID, 4 disks, 86% of 1368 GB used
Jounaling Enabled, Fast CIFS writes, Fast USB writes
Static IP, 1000-BaseT, Jumbo Frames Disabled
CIFS, HTTPS, Rsync Enabled
--------------------------------------------------
NAS1:
ReadyNAS NV+ [X-RAID]
RAIDiator 4.1.6 [1.00a043]
1024 MB [2.5-3-3-7]
X-RAID, 4 disks, 45% of 2776 GB used
Jounaling Enabled, Fast CIFS writes, Fast USB writes
Static IP, 1000-BaseT, Jumbo Frames Disabled
CIFS, HTTPS, Rsync Enabled
--------------------------------------------------
NAS2:
ReadyNAS Pro Pioneer Edition [X-RAID2]
RAIDiator 4.2.5
1024 MB [4-5-5-15 DDR2]
X-RAID2, 6 disks, 27% of 4611 GB used
Jounaling Enabled, Fast CIFS writes, Fast USB writes
Static IP, 1000-BaseT, Jumbo Frames Disabled
CIFS, NFS, HTTPS, Rsync Enabled
--------------------------------------------------
PC
ASUS A8N-SLI Premium - AMD64 X2 2.4GHz
2 GB [2.0-2-2-5]
Windows XP Pro - SP3
NTFS, RAID 0+1 - 4 disks, 50% of 465 GB used
Static IP, 1000-BaseT, Jumbo Frames Disabled
--------------------------------------------------
Network Switches:
SMC GS16 16 ports - 10/100/1000T w/ JF 9K Support
--------------------------------------------------
PC<=GS16=>NAS0:
Read Throughput: 27MBytes/sec
Write Througput: 17MBytes/sec
--------------------------------------------------
PC<=GS16=>NAS1:
Read Throughput: 37MBytes/sec
Write Througput: 23MBytes/sec
--------------------------------------------------
PC<=GS16=>NAS2:
Read Throughput: 68 MBytes/sec
Write Througput: 88 MBytes/sec
--------------------------------------------------
Message 180 of 309
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2009-10-08
01:29 AM
2009-10-08
01:29 AM
Re: Post your performance results
Sorry, no IO Meter results, but FTP/Samba speeds:
ReadyNAS Duo RAIDiator 4.1.6 JumboFrames on
1GB Ram
2x Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.B (1TB) X-Raid
2x D-Link DGS-1005D Green Ethernet, 5-Port Gigabit Switch , Jumbo Frames capable
Athlon X64-2,
4GB Ram,
XP-Home SP3,
Intel PRO/1000 MT Server Adapter PCI JumboFrames 9k
FTP/Samba Write: 20.5 MB/s (4GB linux iso)
FTP/Samba Read 25.5 MB/s (4GB linux iso)
FTP/Samba/NFS on, Journaling off, fast write CIFS, streaming off.
ReadyNAS Duo RAIDiator 4.1.6 JumboFrames on
1GB Ram
2x Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.B (1TB) X-Raid
2x D-Link DGS-1005D Green Ethernet, 5-Port Gigabit Switch , Jumbo Frames capable
Athlon X64-2,
4GB Ram,
XP-Home SP3,
Intel PRO/1000 MT Server Adapter PCI JumboFrames 9k
FTP/Samba Write: 20.5 MB/s (4GB linux iso)
FTP/Samba Read 25.5 MB/s (4GB linux iso)
FTP/Samba/NFS on, Journaling off, fast write CIFS, streaming off.
Message 181 of 309
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2009-11-17
10:42 AM
2009-11-17
10:42 AM
Re: Post your performance results
DataMover iSCSI performance results for the ReadyNas NVX product can be found at www.moojit.com under the Reviews section.
Message 182 of 309
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2009-12-16
11:55 PM
2009-12-16
11:55 PM
Re: Post your performance results
Copernicus wrote: Are people with Windows 7 having the same speed issues I am? Running an IO meter will max my transfer speeds at about 8 MB/s both write and read. Everything seems to be running at gigabit speeds between my computer to the nas. When I switch to XP sp3 I have no issues reaching 29 MB/s.
Is this a Windows 7 issues or what?
Readynas NV+ 4.1.6 firmware
was having the issue with a new build. ended up being Malwarebytes Anti-Malware program holding the speeds down. Turned it off and my speeds went from 5-8MBs to 24-25MBs. Hope this helps.
Message 183 of 309
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2009-12-17
01:28 PM
2009-12-17
01:28 PM
Re: Post your performance results
Write MBps
24.814101
Read MBps
38.39565
Firmware: RAIDiator 4.1.5 [1.00a043]
Memory: 1024 MB
fastwrites enabled, jumbo frames off
24.814101
Read MBps
38.39565
Firmware: RAIDiator 4.1.5 [1.00a043]
Memory: 1024 MB
fastwrites enabled, jumbo frames off
Message 184 of 309
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2010-01-06
11:45 AM
2010-01-06
11:45 AM
Re: Post your performance results
ReadyNAS X6 (Rev. A) 1GB memory
3x Samsung HD501J 500MB drives
Netgear GS108 switch
Jumbo Frames Enabled
Cat 5e cables
IOMeter results
----------------
Write MBps
28.15229
Read MBps
35.90566
I have just ordered some Cat 6 cables to replace the 5e cables I'm currently using, so I will re-run the tests and posts the results when that swap out has been completed.
3x Samsung HD501J 500MB drives
Netgear GS108 switch
Jumbo Frames Enabled
Cat 5e cables
IOMeter results
----------------
Write MBps
28.15229
Read MBps
35.90566
I have just ordered some Cat 6 cables to replace the 5e cables I'm currently using, so I will re-run the tests and posts the results when that swap out has been completed.
Message 185 of 309
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2010-01-07
10:41 AM
2010-01-07
10:41 AM
Re: Post your performance results
ReadyNAS Duo
Seagate HD 1TB
Netgear WNDR3700 Router
Jumbo Frames Disabled
ReadyNas MTU: 1500
Wireless NIC: Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 4965AGN, 1492 MTU
IOMeter results for Wireless, connected on 5ghz wireless-N
----------------
Write MBps
11
Read MBps
10
Realtime download via wireless is between 8-10 MB/s
Are these good results?
Seagate HD 1TB
Netgear WNDR3700 Router
Jumbo Frames Disabled
ReadyNas MTU: 1500
Wireless NIC: Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 4965AGN, 1492 MTU
IOMeter results for Wireless, connected on 5ghz wireless-N
----------------
Write MBps
11
Read MBps
10
Realtime download via wireless is between 8-10 MB/s
Are these good results?
Message 186 of 309
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2010-03-28
02:41 AM
2010-03-28
02:41 AM
Re: Post your performance results
Model: ReadyNAS Duo [X-RAID]
Firmware: RAIDiator 4.1.6 [1.00a043]
Memory: 1024 MB [2.5-3-3-7]
Disks: WD green 1tb (WD10EADS)
Jumbo packets off
journaling disabled
APC back-UPS ES 700
win 7 x64 client robocopy using real file transfer:
write: 22.5mb/s
read: 40mb/s
Firmware: RAIDiator 4.1.6 [1.00a043]
Memory: 1024 MB [2.5-3-3-7]
Disks: WD green 1tb (WD10EADS)
Jumbo packets off
journaling disabled
APC back-UPS ES 700
win 7 x64 client robocopy using real file transfer:
write: 22.5mb/s
read: 40mb/s
Message 187 of 309
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2010-04-01
11:52 PM
2010-04-01
11:52 PM
Re: Post your performance results
ReadyNAS NV+, 256MB
2x Seagate 1TB drives ST31000528AS Firmware: CC38 (stock)
2x Seagate 1.5TB drives ST31500341AS Firmware: SD37
All performance options are on the default settings except as stated below
Netgear GS116 switch
CAT 5e/6 cable
Test System:
Windows 7 64-bit
Zotac 9300-ITX motherboard, 2GB RAM
NVidia nForce ethernet
Intel Q8200 Quad-Core CPU @ 2.33GHz
MTU=1500
29.49 MB/s Read
11.718 MB/s Write
MTU=1492
41.74 MB/s Read
22.48 MB/s Write
MTU=Jumbo (NX+) MTU=4k (Win 7)
41.21 MB/s Read
27.24 MB/s Write
Machine 2:
iMac 2.8GHz C2D, 4GB RAM
OS X 10.6.3
MTU=Jumbo on NX+ and iMac
Read = 37.5 MB/s (via FTP and Cyberduck)
Write = 140.0 MB/s (via FTP and Cyberduck)
APF
Read = 53.47 MB/s, 51.81 MB/s (yes, I don't believe it either, so I repeated it)
Write = 25.15 MB/s
CIFS
Read = 16.67 MB/s
Write = 5.41 MB/s
An interesting note is that once the CIFS copy is finished, the NV+ refuses to disconnect from the share and then becomes unresponsive for about 10 minutes. It eventually recovers, so the lesson here is no CIFS on the Macs. I'm now trying to determine if the slowdown is due to the Mac or the NV+.
EDIT:
Slowdown is some interaction between the NV+ and the Mac. The Windows 7 machine is still as peppy as ever. I went back to enabling jumbo frames and everything is good now as long as I avoid CIFS on the Macs.
2x Seagate 1TB drives ST31000528AS Firmware: CC38 (stock)
2x Seagate 1.5TB drives ST31500341AS Firmware: SD37
All performance options are on the default settings except as stated below
Netgear GS116 switch
CAT 5e/6 cable
Test System:
Windows 7 64-bit
Zotac 9300-ITX motherboard, 2GB RAM
NVidia nForce ethernet
Intel Q8200 Quad-Core CPU @ 2.33GHz
MTU=1500
29.49 MB/s Read
11.718 MB/s Write
MTU=1492
41.74 MB/s Read
22.48 MB/s Write
MTU=Jumbo (NX+) MTU=4k (Win 7)
41.21 MB/s Read
27.24 MB/s Write
Machine 2:
iMac 2.8GHz C2D, 4GB RAM
OS X 10.6.3
MTU=Jumbo on NX+ and iMac
Read = 37.5 MB/s (via FTP and Cyberduck)
Write = 140.0 MB/s (via FTP and Cyberduck)
APF
Read = 53.47 MB/s, 51.81 MB/s (yes, I don't believe it either, so I repeated it)
Write = 25.15 MB/s
CIFS
Read = 16.67 MB/s
Write = 5.41 MB/s
An interesting note is that once the CIFS copy is finished, the NV+ refuses to disconnect from the share and then becomes unresponsive for about 10 minutes. It eventually recovers, so the lesson here is no CIFS on the Macs. I'm now trying to determine if the slowdown is due to the Mac or the NV+.
EDIT:
Slowdown is some interaction between the NV+ and the Mac. The Windows 7 machine is still as peppy as ever. I went back to enabling jumbo frames and everything is good now as long as I avoid CIFS on the Macs.
Message 188 of 309
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2010-04-21
10:43 AM
2010-04-21
10:43 AM
Re: Post your performance results
TEST 1:
ReadyNas 3200 JumboFrames off
4GB Ram
12 x WDRE3 (1TB) X-Raid
1x Procurve 2510G
Proliant dl380 G6 (6 x 300 g.b. sas drives) 36 G.B Ram
Esx Version 4
To test speed i ran vmkfstools -i /vmfs/....vmkd /vmfs/../readynas/destination.vmdk
NFS Write: 115 MB/s (15 GB Vmdk file)
NFS Read 90 MB/s (15 GB vmdk file)
TEST 2:
Same hardware setup as above.
XP virtual machine with 3 G.B. Ram.
mounted nfs volume and used fastcopy to test.
CIFS write 70 MB/sec ( 3 G.B. iso file)
CIFS Read 68 MB/sec ( 3 G.B. iso file)
ReadyNas 3200 JumboFrames off
4GB Ram
12 x WDRE3 (1TB) X-Raid
1x Procurve 2510G
Proliant dl380 G6 (6 x 300 g.b. sas drives) 36 G.B Ram
Esx Version 4
To test speed i ran vmkfstools -i /vmfs/....vmkd /vmfs/../readynas/destination.vmdk
NFS Write: 115 MB/s (15 GB Vmdk file)
NFS Read 90 MB/s (15 GB vmdk file)
TEST 2:
Same hardware setup as above.
XP virtual machine with 3 G.B. Ram.
mounted nfs volume and used fastcopy to test.
CIFS write 70 MB/sec ( 3 G.B. iso file)
CIFS Read 68 MB/sec ( 3 G.B. iso file)
Message 189 of 309
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2010-04-28
07:52 AM
2010-04-28
07:52 AM
Re: Post your performance results
I'm almost ashamed..
Model: ReadyNAS Pro Pioneer Edition [X-RAID2] Dual Redundancy
Serial: 1YA59CR?x?x?x
Firmware: RAIDiator 4.2.9
Memory: 1024 MB [4-5-5-15 DDR2]
IP address 1: 192.168.1.111
IP address 2: Not Connected
Volume C: Online, X-RAID2, 6 disks, 85% of 7413 GB used
I am running 6 x WD20EARS with jumbo frames and the jumbo does make a difference.
I'm feeling that running XRaid2 with 2 x redundancy might be significantly slower than single redundancy.
I didn't really research as I needed double redundancy and that was that as my budget was limited....
Hmmmm its hard to say limited budget and $3400 in the same breath,
but u get what i mean. RNPP 8 x WD20EARS HDD
copying a 7.79 GB (8,370,782,376 bytes) file to the NAS took 5:55 secs or ~=22 MB/s
and 1:40 secs from the NAS to the Win7 PC so 77.9MB/sec i.e.~=7790MB/100secs
22.0 MB/s write to NAS
77.9 MB/s read from NAS
@berkut
More information please?
Such as are you in Dual Redundancy mode? What file copy method did you use? CIFS copy? 8Gb file?
If i were you i would be very careful and not update the firmware until you have had a good read as 4.2.8 was the last version without pausing and dropout issues.
EDIT: added my Slow performance.
Model: ReadyNAS Pro Pioneer Edition [X-RAID2] Dual Redundancy
Serial: 1YA59CR?x?x?x
Firmware: RAIDiator 4.2.9
Memory: 1024 MB [4-5-5-15 DDR2]
IP address 1: 192.168.1.111
IP address 2: Not Connected
Volume C: Online, X-RAID2, 6 disks, 85% of 7413 GB used
I am running 6 x WD20EARS with jumbo frames and the jumbo does make a difference.
I'm feeling that running XRaid2 with 2 x redundancy might be significantly slower than single redundancy.
I didn't really research as I needed double redundancy and that was that as my budget was limited....
Hmmmm its hard to say limited budget and $3400 in the same breath,
but u get what i mean. RNPP 8 x WD20EARS HDD
copying a 7.79 GB (8,370,782,376 bytes) file to the NAS took 5:55 secs or ~=22 MB/s
and 1:40 secs from the NAS to the Win7 PC so 77.9MB/sec i.e.~=7790MB/100secs
22.0 MB/s write to NAS
77.9 MB/s read from NAS
@berkut
berkut wrote: Since I now have three generations of ReadyNAS, I thought I would post my test results. One key point is that for this system I found that disabling Jumbo Framing on all of the devices, gave the best results. I also found that setting the PC's NIC to maximize network throughput vs. CPU utilization made a significant improvement in overall performance. The cost of this operation resulted in CPU utilization increasing from 10% to 30-44% during testing.
--------------------------------------------------
NAS2:
ReadyNAS Pro Pioneer Edition [X-RAID2]
RAIDiator 4.2.5
1024 MB [4-5-5-15 DDR2]
X-RAID2, 6 disks, 27% of 4611 GB used
Jounaling Enabled, Fast CIFS writes, Fast USB writes
Static IP, 1000-BaseT, Jumbo Frames Disabled
CIFS, NFS, HTTPS, Rsync Enabled
--------------------------------------------------
PC<=GS16=>NAS2:
Read Throughput: 68 MBytes/sec
Write Througput: 88 MBytes/sec
--------------------------------------------------
More information please?
Such as are you in Dual Redundancy mode? What file copy method did you use? CIFS copy? 8Gb file?
If i were you i would be very careful and not update the firmware until you have had a good read as 4.2.8 was the last version without pausing and dropout issues.
EDIT: added my Slow performance.
Message 190 of 309
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2010-05-05
01:26 PM
2010-05-05
01:26 PM
Re: Post your performance results
I'm going to take an fing hammer to this Readynas Duo sooner or later.
Copying a 1.2GB set of files over WIFI from it on Windows 7 and it states it will take over 30mins.
Every since I got this its had piss poor performance. I think it's time to ditch it and steer clear or Netgear.
Copying a 1.2GB set of files over WIFI from it on Windows 7 and it states it will take over 30mins.
Every since I got this its had piss poor performance. I think it's time to ditch it and steer clear or Netgear.
Message 191 of 309
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2010-05-22
06:03 PM
2010-05-22
06:03 PM
Re: Post your performance results
ReadyNAS Pro Pioneer
RAIDiator 4.2.8
X-RAID2 6 disks - Seagate ST31000340AS
Has no problems maxing out a gigabit port, consistently see speeds in the 90MB-100MB/s range. The Pro is the real deal thanks to the Core2Duo under the hood.
RAIDiator 4.2.8
X-RAID2 6 disks - Seagate ST31000340AS
Has no problems maxing out a gigabit port, consistently see speeds in the 90MB-100MB/s range. The Pro is the real deal thanks to the Core2Duo under the hood.
Message 192 of 309
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2010-05-24
09:46 PM
2010-05-24
09:46 PM
Re: Post your performance results
ReadyNAS NVX here with 4x2TB WD drives. Jumbo frames enabled. single nic. Getting consistently 75Mbps write speeds with AFP from a Mac and 91 Mbps for read speeds.
Very satisfied with that.
Very satisfied with that.
Message 193 of 309
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2010-05-25
09:04 AM
2010-05-25
09:04 AM
Re: Post your performance results
HELP! My NV+ only gets me 4-8mb write per second.
1gb mem, 4.16 (i think), 4x1000gb, xraid, only cifs, gige LAN with 2 different switches. It's about 91% full that shouldn't affect it right? Jumbo on, all journaling off.
Haven't swapped the cables but doubt that an issue.
1gb mem, 4.16 (i think), 4x1000gb, xraid, only cifs, gige LAN with 2 different switches. It's about 91% full that shouldn't affect it right? Jumbo on, all journaling off.
Haven't swapped the cables but doubt that an issue.
Message 194 of 309
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2010-05-25
12:48 PM
2010-05-25
12:48 PM
Re: Post your performance results
ReadyNAS PRO BUSINESS
RAIDiator 4.2.9
X-RAID2 4 disks - 4xWD 500GB (RE3 WD5002ABYS)
Testing Machine
HP Proliant G6 ML 110
Intel Quad Core Xeon 4GB memory
Drag and Drop copy 3.5 GB file
CIFS
95-105 MB/s write to NAS
80-85 MB/s read from NAS
iSCSI copy 4 GB file
105-110 MB/s write to NAS
65-70 MB/s read from NAS
iSCSI writes are crazy fast!
😄
RAIDiator 4.2.9
X-RAID2 4 disks - 4xWD 500GB (RE3 WD5002ABYS)
Testing Machine
HP Proliant G6 ML 110
Intel Quad Core Xeon 4GB memory
Drag and Drop copy 3.5 GB file
CIFS
95-105 MB/s write to NAS
80-85 MB/s read from NAS
iSCSI copy 4 GB file
105-110 MB/s write to NAS
65-70 MB/s read from NAS
iSCSI writes are crazy fast!
😄
Message 195 of 309
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2010-06-06
11:12 PM
2010-06-06
11:12 PM
Re: Post your performance results
Well, I haven't run IO Meter. But not sure there is much point as right now I am getting transfer speeds of like 7KB/s
😞
😞
Message 196 of 309
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2010-06-09
09:26 PM
2010-06-09
09:26 PM
Re: Post your performance results
I was able to get about 180MB/s sustained with teaming setup on LACP (of course I had to upgrade my switch and buy an intel dual gigabit card that supports LACP) but it was worth it! 🙂
Message 197 of 309
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2010-06-10
04:36 AM
2010-06-10
04:36 AM
Re: Post your performance results
@enkrypt3d
Great story, would be good to see more performance results.
Can you run Bonnie++? and also try atto Bench32 in combination with Dataram RAMDisk v3.5 if you want to test your network as well.
http://www.attotech.com --> Home » Products » Tools » Disk Benchmark
http://www.attotech.com/products/produc ... _Benchmark
http://majorgeeks.com/ATTO_Disk_Benchmark_d6359.html 237KB
Freeware for personal 4GB Dataram_RAMDisk_V3.5.130RC13a.msi
http://memory.dataram.com/products-and-services/software/ramdisk 2.99MB
•Freeware version (up to 4 GB disk size). Disks larger than 4GB require registration and a license which can be purchased for $9.99 USD. •Universal version for WindowsXP/2000, Vista (32 and 64-bit) Home Basic, Home Premium, Business and Ultimate, Windows Server 2003 Standard, Web and Enterprise Edition •Up to 32 GB disk in Vista and Windows 2003, 2008 Server (registered mode) •Save and load features allow RAMDisk to appear as persistent storage even through reboots •Supports Windows 7
Great story, would be good to see more performance results.
Can you run Bonnie++? and also try atto Bench32 in combination with Dataram RAMDisk v3.5 if you want to test your network as well.
http://www.attotech.com --> Home » Products » Tools » Disk Benchmark
http://www.attotech.com/products/produc ... _Benchmark
http://majorgeeks.com/ATTO_Disk_Benchmark_d6359.html 237KB
Freeware for personal 4GB Dataram_RAMDisk_V3.5.130RC13a.msi
http://memory.dataram.com/products-and-services/software/ramdisk 2.99MB
•Freeware version (up to 4 GB disk size). Disks larger than 4GB require registration and a license which can be purchased for $9.99 USD. •Universal version for WindowsXP/2000, Vista (32 and 64-bit) Home Basic, Home Premium, Business and Ultimate, Windows Server 2003 Standard, Web and Enterprise Edition •Up to 32 GB disk in Vista and Windows 2003, 2008 Server (registered mode) •Save and load features allow RAMDisk to appear as persistent storage even through reboots •Supports Windows 7
Message 198 of 309
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2010-06-15
05:54 PM
2010-06-15
05:54 PM
Re: Post your performance results
2 readynas duo
Neither do any better than 16MB/s sustained stream. This is with UPS and all performance switches.
I'm selling these off and going back to system attached storage. The only good Netgear machines are their business ones. The duo was a POS purchased and not built by Netgear has poor support here and does not work very well to my view.
Cost me 750 for two of them. I should have just built a machine for storage but was given the run around by staff who said these POS boxes are good.
Boy, was I taken in.
Neither do any better than 16MB/s sustained stream. This is with UPS and all performance switches.
I'm selling these off and going back to system attached storage. The only good Netgear machines are their business ones. The duo was a POS purchased and not built by Netgear has poor support here and does not work very well to my view.
Cost me 750 for two of them. I should have just built a machine for storage but was given the run around by staff who said these POS boxes are good.
Boy, was I taken in.
Message 199 of 309
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2010-06-17
10:14 AM
2010-06-17
10:14 AM
Re: Post your performance results
My Setup:
Windows 7 machine with single gigabit ethernet
Linksys unmanaged 8 port gigabit switch
NV+ Read Speed : ~32mb/s
NV+ Write Speed: ~18mb/s
NVX Read Speed: ~100mb/s (gradually slows to around ~60mb/s during long transfers)
NVX Write Speed: ~49mb/s
Windows 7 machine with single gigabit ethernet
Linksys unmanaged 8 port gigabit switch
NV+ Read Speed : ~32mb/s
NV+ Write Speed: ~18mb/s
NVX Read Speed: ~100mb/s (gradually slows to around ~60mb/s during long transfers)
NVX Write Speed: ~49mb/s
Message 200 of 309