NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
WAX610 Ceiling Install
I DO see how to ceiling mount the ceiling base plate provided for this install... I do NOT see is where to drill the 2 anchor holes RELATIVE TO the PoE cable ceiling penetration point. Perhaps, a paper template would help. I just don't want the PoE cable to be visible after i slide/snap the WAX610 into place on the ceiling.Vlan Combine when Partition Walls controlled QSC
Looking for info/ help. We are using a M4250-26G4F-POE+ with a QSC core to Combine 2/3 meeting room together. We are using a Huddly Crew Cameras (poe) . I'm looking to Combine 3 Different Vlans together to combine all the cameras Is there a Easy way or Do I need to use command line prompts to allow / deny vlan controlling?Help understanding the "Set the 802.1Q VLAN and management VLAN" WBE750
On my router I have a X550 interface tagged with a vlan ID of "4" which attaches to my switch port as a "trunk port with a vlan id of "4"" on the switch I have an "access Port with a vlan id of "4" that is connected to my "WBE750" RJ45. In the LAN settings of the WBE750 Do I place the vlan id of 4 in the "Untagged VLAN" setting or the "Managed VLAN" setting. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Best RegardsPOST Issues GSM4248UX
Hi, the power on start of self teset on my GSM4248UX is failing. I power on the switch and it starts with the test. All of the ports in the back of the unit light up for a few seconds. The power LED blinks a number of times then stays on red solid light. The switch is not accessible via the OBB or any of the ports. The switch was working fine for a day or tow, but then we updated the software to the latest firmware. V13.0.5.24 Then we started having this issue. I have tried the paper clip reset multiple times, but there are no indications that this is working at all. Any comments will be greatly appreciated.[MS108TUP] - Switching - VLAN and routing
Hello everyone, I've this network configuration: Firewall --> MS108TUP --> Access Point Wifi The firewall and the AP is not a Netgear product. I've a domotic house so I've decided to separate the smart devices from the Main network. So in this case I've created an dedicated AP SSID with VLAN ID 20 only for manage smart devices. My network is also managed by a dedicated firewall device that manage VLAN Interfaces, WAN Interfaces, LAN Interfaces etc etc. Throught this Firewall, manage all the L2/L3 levels, from DHCP (one for every interfaces) to Privacy control, from Captive Portal (for Guests account) to Policy Control rule, ACL, Static route, QoS etc etc. So, I've configured the MS108TUP with several VLAN created in Switching mode (Switching --> VLAN). This is my current VLAN configuration on MS108TUP: MG1 is the Firewall uplink port, instead MG2 is the AP Uplink port. And this is the configuration of the interfaces into my Firewall: In this way, the AP create a SSID with VLAN 20, MG2 take the VLAN 20 and route it on MG1 VLAN 20; the firewall (MG1) take the VLAN 20 on port P2 and create it's own network with it's own dedicated DHCP and Static IPs list. All works good but when, from the firewall, I try to block traffic from/to the same interface/zone, not working. For example, if I try to block the SSH port from the tablet to my Raspberry PI and the tablet and the RPI is in the same interface/zone, the traffic is not blocked (my rule is: from DomoDevicesVLAN to DomoDevicesLAN source "tablet" destination "RPI" any service --> deny ----> this rule must deny the traffic for any service from the tablet to the RPI "using" the same zone but not work). Seems because the packet traffic is directly managed by the MS108TUP. Seems as the request is not passing throught the firewall, but remains at the switch level. For example: 192.168.0.5 --> 192.168.0.6 directly In this way the traffic is bypassing the firewall, because remain into the "switch" level Instead, how I can route the traffic thought the firewall? 192.168.0.5 --> 192.168.0.254 (Firewall interface) --> 192.168.0.6 In this way the traffic must pass into the firewall, and in this way I can have full-control on the packets and I can apply a Policy Control rule. Thank you so much Best Regards, Valerio